2024-07-08 03:20 AM
We based our circuit on the "STKNX Reference Design" (V1.0, 14. Nov. 2019)).
In the case of the single fault condition of a shorted CFH capacitor during operation almost the whole KNX bus voltage (21-30V) is permanently over the 68R resistor (RTX) and generates a big power loss of over 5-12 W (depends on the current KNX voltage).
In the case of a single fault condition at 30 V KNX bus voltage, the overload of RTX leads to an broken RTX with high impedance, so the overload ends automatically --> no danger.
However in the case of a single fault condition at 21 V KNX bus voltage (where the power loss is lower) the lower overload do not lead to an high impedance RTX (maybe the impedance increase a bit, but not enough). So that a power dissipation of 4-5 W are permanentely available, wich heats our case illegally.
For RTX we are using the following type: YAGEO RC2512JK-0768RL
Can you help us to fix this problem?
2024-07-08 03:46 AM
>single fault condition of a shorted CFH capacitor
1. This should never happen ! So choose a CFH cap with min. 50V rating, it will get no short. Problem away.
2. if you want the RTX be "safe" , choose a PTC (or R + PTC) for this; the PTC has to "switch" (get hi resistamce) in case of permanent too hi current here. But no."1" is better solution.
2024-07-08 04:56 AM
Hi AScha.3,
thank you for your quick response.
To 1):
We are using an MLCC, 50 V type. But for these kind of capacitors, as far as i know, a short circuit is a common failure mode ("Low Insulation resistance (IR) or short, along with low or no capacitance are the two most common failure modes for MLCCs.", Source: https://www.kemet.com/en/us/technical-resources/failure-analysis-of-capacitors-and-inductors.html).
So in my mind a shorted CFH cap. is a possible single fault which i have to consider.
To 2):
To put some PTC in this reference design circuit for KNX communication may lead to other problems i don't know, because of the different behavoirs of the resistance on different temperatures and communication load conditions.
My suggestion
For the shorted CFH, my suggestion is to put 2 capacitors in series with a total capacity of CFH according to data sheet. So if one capacitor breaks (shorted), the other capacitor is still there and prevents the problem described above.
Further error case:
The problem of permanentely overload of RTX exists also if i consider a single fault at the STKNX (for example a short circuit between pin R68 and ground).
(My opinion regarding to singel fault condition consideration and ICs (integrated circuits): In the single fault consideration theoretically i have to short every pin with every pin. And Pin R68 shorted to ground is problematically in my mind).
Please correct my opinion if am wrong.
2024-07-08 06:17 AM
1. If you so scared about a mlcc /short , (happens almost only on mechanical stress, bending the board) then dont use it: take film cap , through hole, this cannot short by itself.
2. What are the allowed tolerances here ? (To calculate /select a matching PTC , we have to know.)
2024-07-08 06:52 AM
to 2): What are the allowed tolerances here? (To calculate /select a matching PTC , we have to know.)
We use the given circuits according to the "STKNX Reference Design" (V1.0, 14. Nov. 2019)).
With RTX = 68 Ohm (>= 1 W power dissipation, 5% tolerance).
Our max. environment temperature in the case is +85 °C
Our minimal environemnt temperature is -20 °C
In the case of a single fault its ok, if the environment temperature increase to +115 °C.
I don't know the max tolerated deviation of the RTX for proper functionality (there is no information in the STKNX datasheet or STKNX Reference Design).
2024-07-08 07:08 AM
>2> I don't know the max tolerated deviation of the RTX for proper functionality.
Me too. :) So we cannot design a proper replacement for RTX . It is 68 r.
Maybe you could use a "fuse" resistor...(i dont know, whether you want+ can get this kind of resistor.)
660-TPR1CTA680J (mouser) 1 W type :