Peripherals missing in debug?

hexanpro · ‎2009-10-27

Posted on October 28, 2009 at 02:02

hexanpro · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

Hi!

I'm using the stm32f103zet6 and the rlink standard programmer, but when i'm in debuging mode, can't see some peripherals like uart4 and uart5... When i create the project and select stm32f103zet6 it shows that the device only have 3 Usarts, but in the datasheet refers to more two UARTs 4 and 5?

It is possible to debug them?

Thanks for your time...

tomas23 · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

Push the IDE manufacturer to update their device database. It's clearly their fault not to implement the newest family additions.

Ask through their support channel.

st3 · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

Quote:

Push the IDE manufacturer...

Absolutely - it's a specific issue with a particular IDE - so ask the IDE provider!!

Quote:

It's clearly their fault

It might be the user's fault - not using/configuring the product correctly...?

tomas23 · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

If the device shows in the database? Your guess would be manual update of the database files with forgotten/screwed update of all IDE parts?

hexanpro · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

Thanks for your posts!

Some peripherals like TIM8 i already tested and is working as expected, but is missing from the peripheral tree when in debug mode. I take on other main.c and stm32f10x_it.c files from Ride7 library and paste only my code and run. Results: Only have 3 USARTS before, after i have the 5.

The SysTick, TIM5 to TIM8,and DAC is still missing...

And they are selected in stm32f10x_conf.h

Thanks for your time...

hexanpro · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

Thanks for your reply.

How can i do that? Do you know what files i have to edit?

Thanks for your time...

tomas23 · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

Hi, it was comment to st7 about wrong update/user error.

You have to push the IDE manufacturer, anyway.

hexanpro · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

Thanks again..

So, you suggest that i send an email to raisonance reporting the situation?

st3 · ‎2011-05-17

Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:26

Quote:

So, you suggest that i send an email to raisonance reporting the situation?

Isn't that the obvious approach?

Who is going to know Raisonance's products better than Raisonance themselves?!