About __AdhipShukla

__AdhipShukla · 2024-05-22

Hello,I am developing synchronization libraries on top of ThreadX for an STM32 project. My libraries work perfectly when used on ONLY either the M4 or M7 core while the other core is idling. However, when I attempt to run ThreadX on both cores in AMP...

__AdhipShukla · 2024-05-10

I am working on a ThreadX project on my STM32H747I-Disco with M7 and M4 cores. I want to allocate memory dynamically in the initialization phase that can be accessed from both cores. For this, I am planning to use the "tx_byte_pool_create" and "tx_by...

__AdhipShukla · 2024-05-15

Hi @nouirakh thanks for the reponse. Can you please suggest how to modify the linker scripts so that the memory region(SRAM1, which is shared) is exclusively used for dynamic allocation by ThreadX? Is adding a section like this enough? .SRAM1 :{*(.SR...

__AdhipShukla · 2024-04-11

Hi JSmith, The solution you provided worked. I was facing the same issue but after changing the preemption priority to 15 and the priority group to 4, it started resuming the task after the required delay. Thanks

User statistics

User Activity

STM32H747I-Disco Hard fault in Core M4 after Creating Thread on Core M7 in ThreadX.

How to decide start address in STMH747 for ThreadX Byte/Block Pool

Re: How to decide start address in STMH747 for ThreadX Byte/Block Pool

Re: Threads get suspended forever after calling tx_thread_sleep() [SOLVED]