About Softronic Solutions

Softronic Solutions · 2024-08-20

Dear all,I'm working on an custom hardware project using the STM32G0B1 MCU running ThreadX. My goal is to use/port the USBPD stack for both source as sink device, but I'm failing to do so partly because the stack provided is closed source.The CubeMX...

Softronic Solutions · 2021-09-23

Need some help understanding an interrupt lockup situation.Written some code that is highly depending on interrupts getting serviced. It works fine as long as there is no interrupt nesting situation.In more detail I'm using printf calls/trace message...

Softronic Solutions · 2021-04-15

To pars binary information I created a series of bitfield structurestypedef struct PD_SOURCE_PDO_CAPABILITY { uint32_t MAX_CURRENT_UNITS : 10; uint32_t VOLTAGE_UNITS : 10; uint32_t PEAK_CURRENT : 2; uint32_t RESERVED_BITS22_23 : 2; ...

Softronic Solutions · 2024-09-25

HI @FBL Latest STM32cubeMX update did not solve issue (ticket 190248) any idea when we can expect this fix?I see it as an essential part of your ecosystem that is not working as intended and expected. One would start to think the UCPD stack + tooli...

Softronic Solutions · 2024-09-05

Hi FBL,Thanks for raising that ticket! Does that ticket also include the investigation into why enabling TRACER_EMB removes those otherwise CubeMX included DMA handlers?Got it to compile too...needed to "Enable USB Support" to get those missing files...

Softronic Solutions · 2024-09-04

Hello Nicolas,Humm, first compile results with the one UCPD and SINK only approach are not successful.Getting compile error because CubeMX did not add certain files needed?The code copied-in here is in accordance to all online available example code....

Softronic Solutions · 2024-09-04

Dear Nicolas,FYI when following your recommendation to start with only one UCPD port enabled (for a SINK operation) I could not help noticing that "now" I have Stack + User port 0 parameters available.When you refer to earlier post you can see that t...

Softronic Solutions · 2024-09-04

Hello Nicolas,TX_TIMER_TICKS_PER_SECOND defaults to 100. Are you sure you need "only" one (1) timer tick or in other words one potential task switch per second?Or did you mean 1ms timer intervals, that would set TX_TIMER_TICKS_PER_SECOND = 1000.That...

User statistics

User Activity

AzureRTOS (Threadx) USBPD support

Need some help to understand why pending interrupts are no longer serviced.

Have an issue with reading from union of bitfield structures. The compilation of the program is successful, however the execution interrupts and ends up in the default interrupt handler, which by default is an endless loop. Could this be a compiler issue?

Re: AzureRTOS (Threadx) USBPD support

Re: AzureRTOS (Threadx) USBPD support

Re: AzureRTOS (Threadx) USBPD support

Re: AzureRTOS (Threadx) USBPD support

Re: AzureRTOS (Threadx) USBPD support