Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:29I have fixed this problem. There was a single GPIO tied to a resistor that accounted for about 1.4 mA. That left me with a 210 uA draw that was still too high. What I had to do was setup all GPIOs as analog inputs in s...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:29I have reduced the problem to an experiment with one GPIO line. All GPIO lines are in the power up default state: analog input. I enable one port clock. And one port pin PE.11 is setup as a push/pull output, 50 MHz. Al...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:29Just a quick reply to say thanks. For some reason the automated email did not get to me so I was not away of this greatly appreciated input. I will be going through this in detail as soon as possible.
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:28I am having problems with stop mode for an STM32F103 processor. I expect to get around 120 uA but am somewhere around 1.6 mA. The problem appears to be the state of my GPIOs when entering stop. On http://www.st.com/mcu...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 13:27Hi, The compiler difference would seem to cause the difference. However, I do not find this delay in the sample software or in the documentation. Did I miss that? Plus, checking both the RSTCAL and CAL bits during cali...
