cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

STM32CubeIDE and STM32Cube MX in version 2.0

LVara.1
Associate II

Hi,
I'm a teacher, not a NASA technician, and for years I've been using STM32CubeMX with Nucleo series boards to teach my classes of 16-17 year-olds the basics of microcontroller programming. After a few years, I'd prepared numerous examples of increasing difficulty, with the MX section being a key component. Along with the exercises, I'd prepared the lessons on slides. If the IDE version changed, I'd have to make a few small adjustments. Now, in the labs, some technicians or colleagues have decided to install version 2.0. The difficulties in integrating the MX environment have increased exponentially. I have two solutions: either ask the technicians to ALSO install version 1.19 (an issue that involves extra work, money, time, and arguments with colleagues), or I'll spend a few weeks adapting the exercises (the first three took me two days) and rewriting the lessons. I would like to point out that in the integrated environment, only one lesson was needed to explain the MX functions, now with separate MX (which presents enormous difficulties in the interface, more lessons will be needed to operate on an environment that is, to say the least, 'wooden'). Thanks for everything anyway.

1 REPLY 1
Souhaib MAZHOUD
ST Employee

Hello @LVara.1 

This article provides an explanation of the new workflow and iterative development for the new version of CubeIDE 2.0.0 .

See also these posts:

STM32CubeIDE 2.0 release - early heads-up!

IDE Version 2.0.0 - why remove MX ?

 

BR, Souhaib

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.