cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

STM32H563 read from flash bug

Ehow
Associate II

Hi,

 

I have an IAP project which have image A and image B. Image A is on flash bank1 and image B is on flash bank 2. When I run image A and upgrade image B, I will trigger the bug when doing soft CRC. The system is running on freertos.

stc.png

My soft crc code is like this:

const unsigned short crc_table[256] = {
    0x0000, 0xc0c1, 0xc181, 0x0140, 0xc301, 0x03c0, 0x0280, 0xc241,
    0xc601, 0x06c0, 0x0780, 0xc741, 0x0500, 0xc5c1, 0xc481, 0x0440,
    0xcc01, 0x0cc0, 0x0d80, 0xcd41, 0x0f00, 0xcfc1, 0xce81, 0x0e40,
    0x0a00, 0xcac1, 0xcb81, 0x0b40, 0xc901, 0x09c0, 0x0880, 0xc841,
    0xd801, 0x18c0, 0x1980, 0xd941, 0x1b00, 0xdbc1, 0xda81, 0x1a40,
    0x1e00, 0xdec1, 0xdf81, 0x1f40, 0xdd01, 0x1dc0, 0x1c80, 0xdc41,
    0x1400, 0xd4c1, 0xd581, 0x1540, 0xd701, 0x17c0, 0x1680, 0xd641,
    0xd201, 0x12c0, 0x1380, 0xd341, 0x1100, 0xd1c1, 0xd081, 0x1040,
    0xf001, 0x30c0, 0x3180, 0xf141, 0x3300, 0xf3c1, 0xf281, 0x3240,
    0x3600, 0xf6c1, 0xf781, 0x3740, 0xf501, 0x35c0, 0x3480, 0xf441,
    0x3c00, 0xfcc1, 0xfd81, 0x3d40, 0xff01, 0x3fc0, 0x3e80, 0xfe41,
    0xfa01, 0x3ac0, 0x3b80, 0xfb41, 0x3900, 0xf9c1, 0xf881, 0x3840,
    0x2800, 0xe8c1, 0xe981, 0x2940, 0xeb01, 0x2bc0, 0x2a80, 0xea41,
    0xee01, 0x2ec0, 0x2f80, 0xef41, 0x2d00, 0xedc1, 0xec81, 0x2c40,
    0xe401, 0x24c0, 0x2580, 0xe541, 0x2700, 0xe7c1, 0xe681, 0x2640,
    0x2200, 0xe2c1, 0xe381, 0x2340, 0xe101, 0x21c0, 0x2080, 0xe041,
    0xa001, 0x60c0, 0x6180, 0xa141, 0x6300, 0xa3c1, 0xa281, 0x6240,
    0x6600, 0xa6c1, 0xa781, 0x6740, 0xa501, 0x65c0, 0x6480, 0xa441,
    0x6c00, 0xacc1, 0xad81, 0x6d40, 0xaf01, 0x6fc0, 0x6e80, 0xae41,
    0xaa01, 0x6ac0, 0x6b80, 0xab41, 0x6900, 0xa9c1, 0xa881, 0x6840,
    0x7800, 0xb8c1, 0xb981, 0x7940, 0xbb01, 0x7bc0, 0x7a80, 0xba41,
    0xbe01, 0x7ec0, 0x7f80, 0xbf41, 0x7d00, 0xbdc1, 0xbc81, 0x7c40,
    0xb401, 0x74c0, 0x7580, 0xb541, 0x7700, 0xb7c1, 0xb681, 0x7640,
    0x7200, 0xb2c1, 0xb381, 0x7340, 0xb101, 0x71c0, 0x7080, 0xb041,
    0x5000, 0x90c1, 0x9181, 0x5140, 0x9301, 0x53c0, 0x5280, 0x9241,
    0x9601, 0x56c0, 0x5780, 0x9741, 0x5500, 0x95c1, 0x9481, 0x5440,
    0x9c01, 0x5cc0, 0x5d80, 0x9d41, 0x5f00, 0x9fc1, 0x9e81, 0x5e40,
    0x5a00, 0x9ac1, 0x9b81, 0x5b40, 0x9901, 0x59c0, 0x5880, 0x9841,
    0x8801, 0x48c0, 0x4980, 0x8941, 0x4b00, 0x8bc1, 0x8a81, 0x4a40,
    0x4e00, 0x8ec1, 0x8f81, 0x4f40, 0x8d01, 0x4dc0, 0x4c80, 0x8c41,
    0x4400, 0x84c1, 0x8581, 0x4540, 0x8701, 0x47c0, 0x4680, 0x8641,
    0x8201, 0x42c0, 0x4380, 0x8341, 0x4100, 0x81c1, 0x8081, 0x4040,
};

// CRC16-ARC
unsigned short do_crc_table(unsigned char *ptr, int len)
{
    unsigned short crc = 0x0000;

    while(len--)
    {
        crc = (crc >> 😎 ^ crc_table[(crc ^ *ptr++) & 0xff];
    }

    return (crc);
}

 

The phenomenon is that when I do soft crc after upgrading image B, the PC counter will stuck at SPI2 error handler when running 

    while(len--)
    {
        crc = (crc >> 😎 ^ crc_table[(crc ^ *ptr++) & 0xff];
    }

But all SPIs are deinit at that time. If I remove the code for SPI2 error handler. hander. It will enter NMI Handler.  Apparently PC takes a wrong pointer value, just like a wild pointer.

 

I checked assembly and thought the only possibility to make PC out of control is 

MOV r0,#0xfe14
MOVT r0,#0x803
LDRH r0,[r0, r2, LSL, #1]

Capture.PNG

Then, with only adding volatile to crc variable, the soft CRC check can be successfully done when upgrading image B from image A.

    volatile unsigned short crc = 0x0000;

So it seems like volatile is necessary to avoid triggering this bug. But theoretically there should not be any bug with my original code.

 

BTW, if I simply call the software check without erasing/writing flash, it can always work.

1 REPLY 1
TDK
Guru

> If I remove the code for SPI2 error handler. hander. It will enter NMI Handler. 

If SPI2 is not active, probably it is in a default handler and not SPI2. When it's in the unexpected handler, look at VECTACTIVE field within SCB->ICSR. Subtract 16 to get the IRQn_Type value. Probably that will give you a clue as to what's happening.

Making crc volatile probably just masks the issue without solving the actual bug.

If you feel a post has answered your question, please click "Accept as Solution".