cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forum participation by ST

Posted on October 01, 2012 at 16:10

Would it be possible for ST, it's technical staff, or FAE's to participate in this forum in a more meaningful way?

#evertdekker.com
Tips, Buy me a coffee, or three.. PayPal Venmo
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
42 REPLIES 42
Posted on August 12, 2015 at 13:57

> I don't think I've seen a single post from them.

Mayla is quite regular in this particular sub-forum, and recently Syrine provides support almost daily. I don't know about other sub-fora.

JW

Posted on August 12, 2015 at 14:27

It does ebb and flow, there seem to be a handful these days, and HAL/Cube gets some more significant resources.

Not sure we're seeing much FAE participation, or the design teams with an appreciation of the gate-level design and issues. Then again I can see there being the potential for things to get contentious or acrimonious if arguments break out. It's definitely a hard thing to balance.

If ST has a Timer-Ninja, there's certainly a lot of examples and tricks that could take some solid analysis and diagramming.

Tips, Buy me a coffee, or three.. PayPal Venmo
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
mikael239955_stm1_st
Associate III
Posted on August 17, 2015 at 01:50

What a fart in many peoples faces it would be if ST one day decided to just shut down the

forum. I would like to have more proper and correctly written documentation, that in it self

would take away lots of support issues and dependencies.

For instance ST are in rev 15 for the STM32F103, still there are register bits that's left completely out of any resonable explenation what they acually do and what dependencies

they might have.