FAQs
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Unable to set up non-cacheable MPU regions for LwIP/ethernet when using FreeRTOS-MPU on STM32H743ZI?

JC
Associate II

‎2020-04-03 06:59 AM

Hi there,

I've been dealing with this problem for a while, and can't seem to find the root of it. I've already dug through the forums, datasheets, application notes, etc. with no success.

At this point, I'd be very greatful for any pointers or suggestions you may have.

Setup:

  • Hardware: Nucleo-H743ZI2
  • IDE: IAR for Arm v8.32.1
  • SDK: STM32Cube_FW_H7_V1.6.0

Goals:

  • Run FreeRTOS + LwIP to serve a test webpage
  • Do NOT disable DCache globally

Current status:

  • I can run The SDK's LwIP example just fine.
    • Does NOT use FreeRTOS
    • Allocates a couple MPU regions through ST's HAL to avoid cache coherence problems between the CPU and the Ethernet's DMA
    • DCache is enabled
  • I can run FreeRTOS' MPU example just fine.
    • Allocates MPU regions for multiple tasks through the FreeRTOS API. The FreeRTOS port accesses the MPU directly, so this project does not use ST's MPU HAL
    • DCache is enabled
  • I can get the system to work with MPU-protected tasks and LwIP's HTTP server at the same time, but:
    • If I try to set up MPU regions for the DMA-accessible buffers through the HAL, the MCU hits an "MPU or Execute Never" exception at the first non-privileged instruction fetch.
    • The SDK's FreeRTOS port for this core (the M4-MPU port) does not support a NON_CACHEABLE region configuration, so I can't use it to resolve the cache coherence issues
    • As a result, the DCache needs to be disabled globally for ethernet to work. Obviously unacceptable

Questions:

  1. Why doesn't the SDK's ARM_CM4_MPU FreeRTOS port support non-cacheable MPU regions? Or am I missing something?
  • Only the ARM_CM23, ARM_CM23_NTZ, ARM_CM33 and ARM_CM33_NTZ define portMPU_NORMAL_MEMORY_NON_CACHEABLE
  1. Should it be possible to allocate some MPU regions through the HAL and others through FreeRTOS?
  • If it is possible, why would my application throw a memory exception on the first non-privileged instruction fetch?
    • If it's not possible, why? And how would you suggest I solve the problem? Rewrite the port, use a different one, or use it differently?

I'm attaching my current linker config file, MPU initialization code and ethernetif.c.

All that code is very much work in progress; so please, forgive poor naming, dead code, and similar shortcomings.

Should you need anything else, or if you'd like me to simplify any of that code, please let me know.

Thanks for your time,

JC

Labels:
Preview file
2 KB
Preview file
4 KB
Preview file
21 KB
Preview file
3 KB
0 Kudos
8 REPLIES 8
JC
Associate II

‎2020-04-03 01:23 PM

I'm still investigating register values under different scenarios.

I'm running some tests to analyze the MPU registers, so I'll update this post when I have more workable data.

For now, here's some other register values at the fault handler:

  • IPSR = 0x00000004
  • CFSR_UFSR_BFSR_MMFSR=0x00000001
    • IACCVIOL=1
  • HFSR=0x00000000
  • DFSR=0x0000000B
    • VCATCH=1
    • BKPT=1
    • HALTED=1
  • BFAR=0x00000000
  • SHCRS=0x00010081

If you'd like to know the values of any particular registers, just let me know.

0 Kudos
Pavel A.
Evangelist III

‎2020-04-03 06:38 PM

> Why doesn't the SDK's ARM_CM4_MPU FreeRTOS port support non-cacheable MPU regions? Or am I missing something?

STM32H743 does not have M4 cores. You're running on M7.

--pa

0 Kudos
alister
Lead

‎2020-04-03 07:12 PM

Check the MPU regions at https://community.st.com/s/question/0D50X0000C6eNNSSQ2/bug-fixes-stm32h7-ethernet.

You hadn't said you would, but avoid making the DMA descriptor regions cacheable as it'd cost more cycles than you'd gain.

0 Kudos
JC
Associate II
In response to Pavel A.

‎2020-04-06 07:51 AM

M4 and M7 are compatible at this level. That's why the SDK only provides an M7-specific port to work around a silicon errata in the r0p1 core revision.

From the M7 port's ReadMe.txt:

The first option is to use the ARM Cortex-M4F port, and the second option is to
use the Cortex-M7 r0p1 port - the latter containing a minor errata workaround.
 
If the revision of the ARM Cortex-M7 core is not r0p1 then either option can be
used, but it is recommended to use the FreeRTOS ARM Cortex-M4F port located in
the /FreeRTOS/Source/portable/IAR/ARM_CM4F directory.
 
If the revision of the ARM Cortex-M7 core is r0p1 then use the FreeRTOS ARM
Cortex-M7 r0p1 port located in the /FreeRTOS/Source/portable/IAR/ARM_CM7_MPU/r0p1
directory.

As far as I can tell, my chip does not have an r0p1 core, so I'm using the recommended M4 port, just like the SDK's FreeRTOS examples.

0 Kudos
JC
Associate II
In response to alister

‎2020-04-07 10:03 AM

Thanks for the feedback, alister.

I've been going through your code, and can't identify any fatal differences. Here's the main ones I could find:

  • You allocate much more memory to the ethernet' s Rx buffer. I don't need it yet -- works with DCache off, so it should be ok
  • You have the linker script align the memory, while I set the aligned addresses myself:
    • 0x30047100 for size=0x100
    • 0x30044000 for size=0x2000 -- I've modified this address since my original post. It was not properly aligned. Still getting the same error
    • 0x30040000 for size=0x4000
  • You use the SRAM3 and AXI regions, while I fit everything into SRAM3 -- works with DCache off, so it should be ok
  • You don't have an MPU region for LwIP's heap. I'm not sure how you ensure the Tx buffer's cache coherency; is it not necessary? -- Either way, I use a non-cacheable MPU region, just like the SDK's LwIP example, so I guess it should be OK (?)

Did you ever see the "crash on 1st non-privileged instruction fetch" problem?

I find it odd that the fault doesn't occur during MPU configuration, or after LwIP/ethernet are put to work, but whenever I switch to user mode.

To me, it feels like my MPU_Config() is reconfiguring the MPU regions allocated to FreeRTOS tasks, so that's why I'm studying the MPU registers now. But does that make sense to you? because you seem to have it running, and I can't see you working around any incompatibilities. Did I miss anything?

0 Kudos
alister
Lead
In response to JC

‎2020-04-07 05:17 PM

>You have the linker script align the memory, while I set the aligned addresses myself

You can check their start addresses and sizes in your linker map file.

>You use the SRAM3 and AXI regions

My region sizes weren't final. I'd selected non-optimal-domains after weighing the other peripherals/functions I'm supporting.

>You don't have an MPU region for LwIP's heap. I'm not sure how you ensure the Tx buffer's cache coherency

I'd modified the STM32H7 lwIP's ethernetif.c. These macro's I'd added there control cache-coherency. I'd described these and my rationale in a post to that thread on "February 17, 2020 at 5:55 PM".

#define ETH_RX_BUFFERS_ARE_CACHED     0       /* To conserve memory, this app positions its Rx Buffers
                                               * (".RxArraySection" section) in a not-cacheable MPU region. */
 
#define ETH_TX_BUFFERS_ARE_CACHED     1       /* Tx buffers are in normal, cached memory. */

>Did you ever see the "crash on 1st non-privileged instruction fetch" problem?

I'm not using privileged mode and I'm not expert.

It's important to understand examples are _only_ that. I sometimes read examples but never use them

Google widely.

You shouldn't need to globally disable D-cache.

You'll need to determine which tasks should execute as privileged. A privileged task can access any region. Perhaps the task that initializes lwIP (and the ETH driver via ethernetif.c), the ethernetif_input or equivalent (for ETH driver rx) and lwIP's tcpip_thread (for ETH driver tx) should be privileged.

0 Kudos
JC
Associate II

‎2020-04-16 10:57 AM

Getting back to register-level debugging... Can anybody make sense of these register values?

Memory Protection Unit	Value	Access	
MPU_CTRL	0x00000000	ReadOnly	
     PRIVDEFENA	0		ReadOnly	
     HFNMIENA	0		ReadOnly	
     ENABLE	0		ReadOnly	
MPU_RNR		0x00000007	ReadWrite	
MPU_RBAR	0x00000007	ReadWrite	
     ADDR	0x0000000	ReadWrite	
     VALID	0		ReadWrite	
     REGION	0x7		ReadWrite	
MPU_RASR	0x00000000	ReadWrite	
     XN		0		ReadWrite	
     AP		0x0		ReadWrite	
     TEX	0x0		ReadWrite	
     S		0		ReadWrite	
     C		0		ReadWrite	
     B		0		ReadWrite	
     SRD	0x00		ReadWrite	
     SIZE	0x00		ReadWrite	
     ENABLE	0		ReadWrite	
MPU_RBAR_A1	0x00000007	ReadWrite	
MPU_RASR_A1	0x00000000	ReadWrite	
MPU_RBAR_A2	0x00000007	ReadWrite	
MPU_RASR_A2	0x00000000	ReadWrite	
MPU_RBAR_A3	0x00000007	ReadWrite	
MPU_RASR_A3	0x00000000	ReadWrite

I pulled them off the Nucleo-H743ZI running the (unmodified) FreeRTOS MPU example from the SDK.

The example is apparently working fine, with a Hard Fault occurring when an un privileged task accesses protected regions; as expected.

None of that makes any sense to me, since not even the MPU_CTRL->ENABLE bit is set.

Got any insight into why I'm seeing them, and how could the example app possibly work like this?

For reference, these are all the RBAR:RASR extracted via printf:

[MPU->RNR: 0x00000000][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000000][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000001][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000001][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000002][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000002][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000003][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000003][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000004][MPU->RBAR: 0x20000004][MPU->RASR: 0x0307001f]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000005][MPU->RBAR: 0x20000005][MPU->RASR: 0x01070011]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000006][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000006][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000007][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000007][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000008][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000008][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000009][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000009][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000a][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000a][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000b][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000b][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000c][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000c][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000d][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000d][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000e][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000e][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000f][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000f][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]

For comparison, these are the register values from the SDK's LwIP example:

Memory Protection Unit	Value	Access	
MPU_CTRL	0x00000005	ReadOnly	
     PRIVDEFENA	1		ReadOnly	
     HFNMIENA	0		ReadOnly	
     ENABLE	1		ReadOnly	
MPU_RNR		0x00000001	ReadWrite	
     REGION	0x01		ReadWrite	
MPU_RBAR	0x30044001	ReadWrite	
     ADDR	0x1802200	ReadWrite	
     VALID	0		ReadWrite	
     REGION	0x1		ReadWrite	
MPU_RASR	0x030C001B	ReadWrite	
     XN		0		ReadWrite	
     AP		0x3		ReadWrite	
     TEX	0x1		ReadWrite	
     S		1		ReadWrite	
     C		0		ReadWrite	
     B		0		ReadWrite	
     SRD	0x00		ReadWrite	
     SIZE	0x0D		ReadWrite	
     ENABLE	1		ReadWrite	
MPU_RBAR_A1	0x30044001	ReadWrite	
MPU_RASR_A1	0x030C001B	ReadWrite	
MPU_RBAR_A2	0x30044001	ReadWrite	
MPU_RASR_A2	0x030C001B	ReadWrite	
MPU_RBAR_A3	0x30044001	ReadWrite	
MPU_RASR_A3	0x030C001B	ReadWrite
------------------ All RBAR:RASR pairs: -------------------
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000000][MPU->RBAR: 0x30040000][MPU->RASR: 0x0301000f]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000001][MPU->RBAR: 0x30044001][MPU->RASR: 0x030c001b]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000002][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000002][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000003][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000003][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000004][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000004][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000005][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000005][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000006][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000006][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000007][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000007][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000008][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000008][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000009][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000009][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000a][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000a][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000b][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000b][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000c][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000c][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000d][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000d][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000e][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000e][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000f][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000f][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]

My current codebase has a seemingly correct MPU_CTRL, and my HAL-allocated regions are there, but none of the FreeRTOS-MPU regions are. They seem to have been overwritten by using the HAL (???)

[MPU->RNR: 0x00000000][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000000][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000001][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000001][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000002][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000002][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000003][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000003][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000004][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000004][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000005][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000005][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000006][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000006][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000007][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000007][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000008][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000008][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000009][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000009][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000a][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000a][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000b][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000b][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000c][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000c][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000d][MPU->RBAR: 0x3004710d][MPU->RASR: 0x0301000f]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000e][MPU->RBAR: 0x3004000e][MPU->RASR: 0x0300001b]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000f][MPU->RBAR: 0x3004400f][MPU->RASR: 0x03000019]

Any ideas as to why the FreeRTOS-MPU regions were seemingly wiped?

0 Kudos
JC
Associate II

‎2020-04-20 09:59 AM

Update: I've found the first problem, but the app is still not working.

This bug is present in the SDK's FreeRTOS ports. I know it's a problem in ARM_CM4_MPU/port.c and ARM_CM7_MPU/r0p1/port.c, but also probably many others.

Those ports use the contents of the MPU->TYPE register to decide whether an MPU is present at runtime. Specifically: 

#define portEXPECTED_MPU_TYPE_VALUE             ( 8UL << 8UL ) /* 8 regions, unified. */

Since the M7 core supports up to 16 memory regions, the device returns 0x00001000 instead of 0x00000100, and FreeRTOS silently initializes without properly configuring or initializing the MPU.

I've fixed that by expecting (16UL<<8UL), and now the FreeRTOS-MPU example actually uses the MPU:

Code:

#if defined(CORE_CM4)
    #define portEXPECTED_MPU_TYPE_VALUE         ( 8UL << 8UL ) /* 8 regions, unified. */
#else
    /* The if statement in this fix is in line with stm32h7xx_hal_cortex.h */
    #define portEXPECTED_MPU_TYPE_VALUE         ( 16UL << 8UL ) /* 16 regions, unified. */
#endif /* defined(CORE_CM4) */

Results: 

[MPU->RNR: 0x00000000][MPU->RBAR: 0x08000000][MPU->RASR: 0x06070029]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000001][MPU->RBAR: 0x08000001][MPU->RASR: 0x0507001b]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000002][MPU->RBAR: 0x20000002][MPU->RASR: 0x01070011]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000003][MPU->RBAR: 0x40000003][MPU->RASR: 0x13000039]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000004][MPU->RBAR: 0x20000004][MPU->RASR: 0x0307001f]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000005][MPU->RBAR: 0x20000005][MPU->RASR: 0x01070011]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000006][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000006][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000007][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000007][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000008][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000008][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x00000009][MPU->RBAR: 0x00000009][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000a][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000a][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000b][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000b][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000c][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000c][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000d][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000d][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000e][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000e][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]
[MPU->RNR: 0x0000000f][MPU->RBAR: 0x0000000f][MPU->RASR: 0x00000000]

But when I test that fix in my custom codebase, the FreeRTOS RBAR:RASR pairs are still wiped, and only my HAL-allocated regions remain.

As a result, my application still crashes.

0 Kudos
Top