2023-11-09 08:19 AM - edited 2023-11-10 03:44 AM
Dear Sir/Madam,
Is it possible to have a STM32 with build in UCPD-controller to deliver 240W at the port? or does anyone have experience with this type of application?
According to (link: https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/ecosystems/stm32-usb-c.html?ecmp=tt21056_gl_link_may2021) I should be able to negotiate of up to 240W with EPR (extended power range) if I make use of the STM32G0 series.
After consulting your presentation (link: https://www.st.com/resource/en/product_presentation/stm32-usb-c-pd-solutions-presentation.pdf) I have come to the knowledge (see page 10) that I also need a TCCP0X port protection IC, I want to have a STM that is able to sink or source power (DRP) according to the presentation I need a TCPP03-M20. Consulting the datasheet of the TCCP03-20 I came to the conclusion that it complies with powers up to 100W only.
Also looking into AN5225 (https://www.st.com/resource/en/application_note/dm00536349-usb-type-c-power-delivery-using-stm32xx-series-mcus-and-stm32xxx-series-mpus-stmicroelectronics.pdf) I don't see any specifications for USB-C PD 3.1 (240W) either...
Another thing to note there is no single port controller or VBUS port protection IC that is suitable for 240W on the current market. I am also aware that I need an energy management system that is able to output 240W but the main question is, is the STM32 capable of driving this power.
Looking forward for your reply, I would like to thank you in advance.
Greetings,
Gorkem
Solved! Go to Solution.
2023-11-10 02:55 AM
Dear Gorkem,
Thanks for the detailed description.
TCPP0x series has been developed several years ago when Power Delivery was 100 W maximum. So the limitation of the TCPP0x series is 100 W because of the voltage of the technology used. For the new EPR up to 240 W, we are investigating in a new TCPPEx series able to manage 240 W. This new series will be able to work with an STM32 having UCPD.
I suggest you contact your local sales office, and they will come back to you once our TCPPEx series is available.
Regards. Philippe Rabier
2023-11-10 02:55 AM
Dear Gorkem,
Thanks for the detailed description.
TCPP0x series has been developed several years ago when Power Delivery was 100 W maximum. So the limitation of the TCPP0x series is 100 W because of the voltage of the technology used. For the new EPR up to 240 W, we are investigating in a new TCPPEx series able to manage 240 W. This new series will be able to work with an STM32 having UCPD.
I suggest you contact your local sales office, and they will come back to you once our TCPPEx series is available.
Regards. Philippe Rabier
2023-11-10 03:39 AM
Dear Philippe,
Does this means that I need to develop a PD circuit without port protection? I you look into the datasheet (https://www.st.com/resource/en/application_note/dm00536349-usb-type-c-power-delivery-using-stm32xx-series-mcus-and-stm32xxx-series-mpus-stmicroelectronics.pdf) @ page 39 you can see that a port protection IC is actually optional but also strongly recommended, so I guess I need to make a trade off between these two.
Greetings,
Gorkem
2023-11-13 02:50 AM
Dear Gorkem,
Protection is like insurance. Everybody does not want to pay for that because it is useless until you get a crash. In our case the crash is either a surge or a short circuit to Vbus. So it is better to add protection.
When do you you expect to get your 240 W system to go in production ?
Regrads
Philippe Rabier
2023-11-16 02:07 AM - edited 2023-11-16 03:03 AM
Dear Philippe,
It is not for production purposes but for my thesis in which I have to design a USB-C DRP station which can deliver up to 240W. It is quite new and it hasn't been implemented before as far as I know. Also a side note, regarding the port protection I am planning to make a port protection with discrete components that is configurable of up to 48V tolerant on the CC and SBU-pins, I will keep you updated.
Thanks in advance.
Greetings,
Gorkem
2023-11-17 12:13 AM
Dear Gorkem,
You are right this is quite new and I am not aware of any IC able to manage 240 W EPR either with µC or stand alone. We are working on it but we wont have product before Q3-2024 as the product is today not fully defined.
CC and SBU-pins must be 55 V tolerant (48 V + tolerance)
Regards. Philippe
2023-11-20 02:07 AM
Yeah, I have to make a discrete circuit for overvoltage protection on the cc and sbu-pins since there are no IC's available to do that for EPR. That is going to be quite challenging..
2024-07-24 04:21 PM
I tried putting zener diodes on these lines as protection and it seems to work well
I haven’t been able to find any EPR support in the STM32 PD 3.1 state machine software though, messages for EPR seem absent.
2024-07-26 12:21 AM
Dear J0ule,
Please keep me updated regarding the progress of your project.
Greetings,
Gorkem