2025-04-09 5:50 PM
We are currently seeking layout recommendations for the ST25R3916 and ST25R3918 chips.
On the Transmitter Side:
ST25R3916B → Power Amplifier → Matching Circuit → Antenna
On the Reciever Side:
Antenna → Matching Circuit →Power Harvester → ST25R3918
We have the following queries:
Solved! Go to Solution.
2025-04-16 11:21 PM
Hello ELTE-Suraj,
For the ST25R3916 section a 4 or more PCB layer are recommended.
For the pure antenna typically 1 or 2 layer are sufficient, dependent on the complexity of the antenna and if you are able to route it.
As an example the ST25R3916-DISCO can be taken.
In addition a Layout recommendation application note is available (AN5240).
BR Travis
2025-04-10 12:43 AM
Hello ELTE-Suraj,
May I ask, which application you are targeting?
We provide a general Application note for PCB layout of our ST25R devices.
For the ST25R3916(B) and ST25R3918 it is AN5240.
Currently we do not have a reference design for an external amplifier. The issue is, that a normal class E amplifier can only do OOK modulation (ISO14443-A and ISO15693) but is not capable of doing AM Modulation (ISO14443-B and Felica).
It is not required to design the PCB traces for the matching network at a certain characteristic impedance. The square signal coming from the driver is only present between RFO pins and EMI filter. between EMI filter and series cap and further towards the antenna, mainly the 13.56MHz is present.
The Lambda/4 is way below the typical trace length between RFO pins and EMI filter. Our recommendation is that the EMI filter is placed as close as possible to the IC. Even when considering the 100th harmonic of 13.56MHz the trace length should be way below.
Please let me know, if you have further questions.
br Travis
2025-04-10 1:18 AM
Hello,
Thank you for your response.
The application involves powering a slave device using a coil (Wurth 760308101150). Therefore, the antenna (NFC coil) will be connected to the PCB using copper wires approximately 20 cm in length.
From your reply, I understand that there is no need to match the characteristic impedance (50 ohms) on the PCB itself.
However, I believe the impedance seen from RFO1 and RFO2 must be matched to 50 ohms.,
For instance, when I tune the network using a VNA, the impedance at 13.56 MHz should be as close to 50 ohms as possible. Is that correct?
If there is no such requirement for 50-ohm impedance matching in NFC applications, please let us know.
2025-04-14 4:49 PM
Just a gentle reminder — I wanted to kindly follow up on my recent query, as I haven’t received a response yet. I would appreciate it if you could take a look when you have a moment
2025-04-15 12:44 AM
Hello ELTE-Suraj,
to match to a certain target matching impedance (e.g. 50 Ohm) does only make sens if your driver has similar impedance. Only exception is, when using designs with an single ended antenna with 50Ohm cable.
The driver impedance of our ST25R chips is typically < 2Ohm. It would mean, that your matching network should be also around 2Ohm. In this case 50% of the power will be dissipated inside the ST25R and 50% will be delivered to the matching network. But efficiency will be around 50% and the resulting total power consumption (I_VDD ~ 772mA) will be out of spec.
We recommend (AN5276) to use the lowest driver resistance by having a higher target matching impedance (e.g. 15Ohm). This way, the efficiency will be ~70% while still having sufficient output power.
The applications where someone needs to go to the maximum of I_VDD (e.g. 350mA / 500mA) are very rare but the chip can handle it.
Please feel free to choose the target matching impedance dependent on your application. No matter if 2Ohm or 50Ohm the IC can handle it as long it is operated withing the absolute maximum ratings, and operating conditions specified in the datasheet.
In my opinion taking care about reflections and characteristic impedance does not make sense for 13.56MHz and trace length < 1cm. The only exception is the connection between RFO pins and EMI filter (=> rectangular broadband signal).
I think it might be interesting for the community to follow your experiments and conclusion. Please share the results within the community and please let me know if you have further questions.
br Travis
2025-04-16 4:55 PM
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
We will begin sharing our observations once we start the actual testing on the mounted PCB. We plan to proceed with the PCB order shortly.
As part of our design, we are creating a separate PCB dedicated to the power amplifier, matching circuit, and EMC filter. This board will interface with the ST25R3916 through the RFO1 and RFO2 outputs, and receive inputs via RFI1 and RFI2.
Could you please advise on the recommended number of PCB layers for the antenna layout?
Regards
Suraj
2025-04-16 11:21 PM
Hello ELTE-Suraj,
For the ST25R3916 section a 4 or more PCB layer are recommended.
For the pure antenna typically 1 or 2 layer are sufficient, dependent on the complexity of the antenna and if you are able to route it.
As an example the ST25R3916-DISCO can be taken.
In addition a Layout recommendation application note is available (AN5240).
BR Travis