2023-12-12 07:30 PM
HI Sir,
we have two different results of the ripple noise
base on same PCBA design, but different L7987 origin:
1. Mark of "ST e3 G9207,L7987, CHN 3L0",ripple noise 2.2V 2.9KHz
input 24V, output 12V, load 5ohm 2.4A
2. Mark of "ST e3 7B658, L7987, PHL 037",ripple noise 0.04V
input 24V, output 12V, load 5ohm 2.4A
the image of the chip and the image of the ripple see below.
why is it like that, it make no sense,
could you please advise.
thanks.
with best regards,
PZha
Solved! Go to Solution.
2023-12-15 08:34 AM
Without at least the Bulk ID, it is no longer possible to determine whether the devices are originals without destructive testing, the file codes are not sufficient for this. However, you can contact your supplier and ask for proof of originality.
Regards
/Peter
2023-12-13 02:25 AM - edited 2023-12-13 02:25 AM
The logo on the CHN looks very mysterious, so you should check the origin of this chip carefully. If the supplier cannot provide a Bulk ID, it is probably a fake.
If you have the Bulk ID, please do not post it here due to the risk of misuse, but have it checked by Online Support OLS.
Regards
/Peter
2023-12-13 09:17 PM
HI Peter,
thanks for your support.
how to find out what the marking "ST e3 G9207,L7987, CHN 3L0" means.
thanks.
with best regards,
PZha
2023-12-14 02:47 AM
It doesn't say 3L0, but 310, which would actually stand for the date code. But as mentioned, I suspect a counterfeit component, which can be recognised by the bulk ID.
2023-12-14 10:00 PM
HI Peter,
thanks for your reply,
some packaging materials no longer exist,
but we have marked the D/C in our ERP system,
could you please send us the instruction for the logo.
appreciated.
with best regards,
PZha
2023-12-15 08:34 AM
Without at least the Bulk ID, it is no longer possible to determine whether the devices are originals without destructive testing, the file codes are not sufficient for this. However, you can contact your supplier and ask for proof of originality.
Regards
/Peter