Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:22Great! Thank you for the thorough explanation. Would it be possible to put this level of detail in the technical manual?Mark
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:22I am a bit disappointed that the two Nops didn't cover it. I had tried a few times with the two NOPS and it appeared to work. Then I ran into a situation where it did not. So I added more under the new conditions. ...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:22The pipeline, tailchaining etc explanation makes some sense. I added two NOPs at the end of the status clear and the problem appears to have gone away. That would seem to support your premise. I had some evidence to...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:22Interestingly enough - I am able to reproduce the same problem on the 207. I guess that makes sense since the timer blocks are very similar. There also seems to be an interval component to the issue. The timer overf...
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 14:22I appreciate the responses. Let me clarify a bit further:I am in full agreement with you regarding quick interrupts. My concern was if an interrupt nested right at the beginning of the timer interrupt. I am speaking...
