Improvement in STSW-ST25RFAL 3.0 source

[CanRF]

Hi

We think the following impotentes should be done in STSW-ST25RFAL 3.0 source

1) Add to rfal_analogConfig.h, rfal_crc.h, rfal_iso15693_2.h header files.

#if defined( __cplusplus )
extern "C" {
#endif

otherwise this file makes it difficult with C++

2) Add to rfal_analogConfig.h header files.

#if !defined( __cplusplus )
typedef struct {
  uint8_t id[sizeof(rfalAnalogConfigId)]; 
  rfalAnalogConfigNum num; 
  rfalAnalogConfigRegAddrMaskVal regSet[];

} rfalAnalogConfig;

#else

struct rfalAnalogConfig;

#endif

C++ can't handle an empty array regSet[] in a struct

3) Add to st25r3916_aat.c source files.

#include <stdlib.h>

This file use abs().

In most compiler abs() is declared in stdlib.h or math.h

4) replace "string.h" with <string.h> in st25r95_com.c, st25r95_com_spi.c, st25r95_com_uart.c

C library Headerfile should included with <> instead ""

[Brian TIDAL]

Hi,

thanks for your feedback. Improvements for C++ 1) and 2) have been submitted to development team.

For 3), <math.h> and <stdlib.h> are both included in rfal_platform.h that is included in st25r3916_aat.c. Can you provide more information on why you need to include <stdlib.h> on your side.

For 4), <string.h> is not needed in those files and therefore "string.h" has been removed.

Rgds

BT

[CanRF]

Hi,

3)

In STSW-ST25RFAL 3.0 I did'nt find a rfal_platform.h. In STSW-ST25R_1.6.0 are in every project a rfal_platform.h. But not all of them has got an include of <stdlib.h>. So I take the wrong file for my project.

I will add <stdlib.h> to my rfal_platform.h.

4)

I will remove string.h too

Thanks für support

[Brian TIDAL]

Hi,

for 3), I see your point and therefore it would be better to have <stdlib.h>  being included in st25r3916_aat.c. I will submit this to the development team.

Thanks for your feedback,

Rgds

BT