cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LM317 adjustable voltage setting question

gdecker1
Associate II

I'm reviewing the datasheet for the LM317 linear regulator, and it lists the equation for calculating voltage as:

VO = VREF (1 + R2/R1) + IADJ R2

If I plug in the numbers from my circuit (and neglect the error calculation), I get:

1.25 * (1+(1400/400))  = 5.625V

However, if I do a straight resistor-divider calculation assuming R1 = 400 and R2 = 1400, and assume 5.625V at the top of R1, I get Vref = 4.375. 

Swapping R1 and R2 (such at R1 = 1400 and R2 = 400) I get Vref = 1.25V with Vout = 5.625

Furthermore, most linear regulators with an adjust pin set the output using the equation 

VO = VREF (1 + R1/R2)

Which tracks with what I'm seeing in the math.

 

Is there a typo in the datasheet, or is there something significant I'm missing in how much current the ADJ pin has on it?

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Peter BENSCH
ST Employee

You have made a small error in your thinking, because the reference voltage of the LM317 is not measured against GND (in your schematic), but against the output – upside down, so to speak. This means that your simple voltage divider gives exactly the right result across the "upper" resistor.

The correction term R2*IADJ is intended to correct the error that can arise from the current flowing from the ADJ PIN in resistors with higher impedance values.

Does this answer your questions?

Regards
/Peter

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
Peter BENSCH
ST Employee

You have made a small error in your thinking, because the reference voltage of the LM317 is not measured against GND (in your schematic), but against the output – upside down, so to speak. This means that your simple voltage divider gives exactly the right result across the "upper" resistor.

The correction term R2*IADJ is intended to correct the error that can arise from the current flowing from the ADJ PIN in resistors with higher impedance values.

Does this answer your questions?

Regards
/Peter

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.