cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

X-CUBE-ST67W61 for bare metal and/or ThreadX?

Southbranch
Senior II

Hi,

We have the X-NUCLEO-67W61M1 (for ST67W) attached to a custom STM32U5-board. Disappointingly we just found out the whole architecture of X-CUBE-ST67W61 seems to rely on FreeRTOS while our app architecture is based on ThreadX…

A light weight bare metal approach would be highly appreciated when starting up simple testing with e.g AT-commands! Then we want to use ThreadX for an HTTP server among other things.

Any recommendations on potential work arounds using the X-CUBE-ST67W61 without switching to FreeRTOS?

Thanks in advance

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
TarikAb
ST Employee

Hi Southbranch,

Please have a look at the bare metal example shared here on STM32 hotspot.

Hope this helps you.


In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Accept as Solution' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
TarikAb
ST Employee

Hi Southbranch,

Please have a look at the bare metal example shared here on STM32 hotspot.

Hope this helps you.


In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Accept as Solution' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
Andrew Neil
Super User

@Southbranch wrote:

Disappointingly we just found out the whole architecture of X-CUBE-ST67W61 seems to rely on FreeRTOS


Well, ST's stated strategy is to use FreeRTOS:

https://community.st.com/t5/developer-news/new-strategic-directions-for-stm32cube/ba-p/799537

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.

Many thanks, I will check this out!

Ohh.. thanks I haven't seen that but can't really believe it, will be a mess for our project...

Seems Free RTOS also will be mixed with USBX and FileX..