Hi,
I'm working on a project with your STM32WB5MM module, I managed to enable ZigBee and connect to the network, but I'm having trouble changing the device name, it keeps identifying itself as default value (STM32WB).
ZigBee Stack: 1.24.0
FW Type : FFD Zigbee stack
In function APP_ZIGBEE_StackLayersInit() I add:
struct ZbZclBasicServerDefaults basic_defaults = {
.app_version = 1,
.stack_version = 2,
.hw_version = 1,
.mfr_name = "0TestName",
.model_name = "0LOCKZ1A",
.date_code = "02026-03-31",
.power_source = ZCL_BASIC_POWER_DC,
.sw_build_id = "0v1.0"
};
static void APP_ZIGBEE_StackLayersInit(void)
{
APP_DBG("APP_ZIGBEE_StackLayersInit");
zigbee_app_info.zb = ZbInit(0U, NULL, NULL);
assert(zigbee_app_info.zb != NULL);
// uint8_t device_name[] = {"0TestDevice"};
// device_name[0] = 10;
// ZbZclBasicWriteDirect(zigbee_app_info.zb, ZB_ENDPOINT_BCAST, ZCL_BASIC_ATTR_MFR_NAME, device_name, device_name[0]);
basic_defaults.mfr_name[0] = strlen((char*)basic_defaults.mfr_name)-1;
basic_defaults.model_name[0] = strlen((char*)basic_defaults.model_name)-1;
basic_defaults.date_code[0] = strlen((char*)basic_defaults.date_code)-1;
basic_defaults.sw_build_id[0] = strlen((char*)basic_defaults.sw_build_id)-1;
ZbZclBasicServerConfigDefaults(zigbee_app_info.zb, &basic_defaults);
/* Create the endpoint and cluster(s) */
APP_ZIGBEE_ConfigEndpoints();
/* USER CODE BEGIN APP_ZIGBEE_StackLayersInit */
/* USER CODE END APP_ZIGBEE_StackLayersInit */
/* Configure the joining parameters */
zigbee_app_info.join_status = (enum ZbStatusCodeT) 0x01; /* init to error status */
zigbee_app_info.join_delay = HAL_GetTick(); /* now */
zigbee_app_info.startupControl = ZbStartTypeJoin;
/* Initialization Complete */
zigbee_app_info.has_init = true;
/* run the task */
UTIL_SEQ_SetTask(1U << CFG_TASK_ZIGBEE_NETWORK_FORM, CFG_SCH_PRIO_0);
}
But it's still identifying itself with default values. What could I be doing wrong?
Is there a way to read the parameters I'm saving to check their validity?
I also tried direct recording using ZbZclBasicWriteDirect() but also no reaction.
Best regards,
Adrian Chmiel
