cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Wireless hopes and dreams

russ
Associate II
Posted on August 10, 2009 at 13:58

Wireless hopes and dreams

21 REPLIES 21
ngaylard
Associate II
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 12:45

Quote:

On 24-09-2008 at 01:36, Anonymous wrote:

You are very correct st7. I should have been more specific.

I am looking at options in the realm of RF. Specifically the 2.4GHz frequency because our product is for international use. The wireless connection is point to point as opposed to mesh so ZigBee is not ideal; however, the 802.15.4 specification would be nice because of its inherent reliability and error-checking.

Transmission rate: >9600 baud

Range: 100m-500m line of sight

No standard protocol is required

No networking is required

You're not going to achieve 100-500m at 2.4Ghz very easily. I suggest that you look at 868Mhz for Europe and 915Mhz for the USA. Software stack should be 99% compatible and the hardware is very similar. 2.4Ghz is very congested with ''unfriendly'' technologies such as WIFI that have a very high duty cycle.

If you would like to contact me directly - we specialise in RF systems development and have recently launched a module based on the STM32 and CC1101 series - supports 9600 baud rate for the the serial communications.

fenice1953
Associate
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 12:45

Hi all,

congratulation for all the information you wrote! I'm a new user and I'd like to ask you an information. I'm totally new in this field thus I hope to avoid silly questions!

I have a SAM9L9260 board, with ARM9 micro on board. So far, I connect the Ethernet port to a D-link device able to enabling a wireless connection.

My question is: is it possible to skip the Ethernet port adding a wireless chip-set? should I consider both chip-set and tranceiver.. ?

Any advise??

thanks