STM32F746 lacks bit-banding?

[dale]

Posted on July 20, 2015 at 21:53

Does the new STM32F7 series omit bit-banding support?

There is no mention of bit-banding in the STM32F7 reference manual.  Attempting to use bit-banding results in a fault condition.I'm surprised by this omission.  Or maybe I'm just missing something?Thanks,Dale Wheat #nothing-of-value-was-lost #stm32f7-bit-banding

[waclawek.jan]

Posted on July 20, 2015 at 22:12

It's a ''feature'' of the Cortex-M7 core. You are supposed to study the ARM documents.

Migration: http://community.arm.com/docs/DOC-9831 TRM: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0489b/index.html JW

[Tesla DeLorean]

Posted on July 20, 2015 at 22:24

I'm sure it gets in the way of a rational cache coherency model, and it's pretty dangerous and non-atomic in the peripheral space.

[jpeacock]

Posted on July 20, 2015 at 22:30

Bit Band is an optional feature in the IP core definition.  It is up to the vendor to decide if it's included or not.  I have noticed that not many Cortex M vendors offer bit banding on new parts, maybe it's not worth the space on the chip and the IP royalty.

Too bad if it's being phased out, it's a very nice feature and one I used frequently.  ST (and ARM too) didn't offer much help in how or where it could be used.  One place where it is a real joy to use is with single bit objects in Modbus, no bit masks, no shifting, no word boundaries, just direct, word aligned addressing for the bit.   Jack Peacock

[Tesla DeLorean]

Posted on July 20, 2015 at 22:47

Bit Band is an optional feature in the IP core definition.

Apparently not in the M7, where ARM has basically said you can back-door this in your own memory mapped implementation if you want, but we're not doing it, thanks.Over the years ARM has been pretty good at eschewing things that add more complexity and transistors than they are worth. With the caching being pulled into core functionality I can see strong drivers for this to be dropped.