cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Best way to clone stm32f103 to new board

Jarrid Graham
Associate II
Posted on February 09, 2017 at 19:33

What I have are two identical boards except for the firmware on one is newer than the other. I thought it should be fairly easy to copy the memory from one to the other . I have a st-link v2 and can copy the firmware (no protection) out and flash it to the other but to does not work after being programmed.

I can get access to the UART1 and boot pins if need be but when I write the memory and compare it, it has been written and checks out , I was just curious what I might be missing.

I will admit that I am not very familiar with the STM32 family of stuff but have worked with other micros over the years

This discussion is locked. Please start a new topic to ask your question.
14 REPLIES 14
Jarrid Graham
Associate II
Posted on February 10, 2017 at 15:40

Well after some more looking around I did find a section at 0x0807000 (12 bytes) that are different, I put back the original firmware and it did work, I had forgotten I did this a month ago before I gave up the first time.

I tried flash up that point , before I was over writing it but still no-go, I don't know if it is checksum check or some other type of check so I guess I need to try to disassemble it and see what is going on out there. I wouldn't think a code checksum since it is different on each board so far. changing any of the bytes results in a no-go.

I am guessing disassemble is next step although I am versed enough to understand anything about that, is there a software that I can watch the MCU , I know you can step with the st-link util but it would be nice to do some kind of break point type thing.

Thanks

Jarrid Graham
Associate II
Posted on February 10, 2017 at 17:23

I will look into that, I am thinking it is something to do with the MCU. On there board there is noting that I would think that can uniquely identify the device, but there must be something.

Thanks

Posted on February 10, 2017 at 16:52

Keil's debugger would work.

I find static analysis to be highly effective, using disassemblers that enable that.

Tips, Buy me a coffee, or three.. PayPal Venmo
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
Posted on February 10, 2017 at 17:50

The chip has a 96-bit Unique ID, it is described in the Reference Manual for the part.

Tips, Buy me a coffee, or three.. PayPal Venmo
Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
Jarrid Graham
Associate II
Posted on February 12, 2017 at 17:54

Well in poking around they do look at 0x1FFF F7E8 in one section of code but it doesn't directly relate to what I am seeing. To be honest I am going to tinker with it but it is way above my level of knowledge at this point. 

While in the long run I guess I don't need to know , now I am curious and that normally leads me down a path of learning something new at least.

Thanks