cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Using VPS_TX=5V on ST25R95

srath.11
Associate

I had powered VPS_TX of ST25R95 on 5V. So, ideally there should be improvement on the magnetic field as per the calculated data using that calculation tool. But I got adverse effect of it. It can't detect the tag, which works fine on 3.3V VPS_TX supply.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Brian TIDAL
ST Employee

Hi Sunil,

See https://community.st.com/s/question/0D53W00000HLDkKSAX/improve-rf-field-st25r95 for similar question.

Basically, Increasing power by putting 5V has benefit in the transmit path but have also impact on receive path because their is no modification on chip sensitivity and thus Tag answer may be not seen correctly.

Therefore, ST recommends to use 3.3V configuration with ST25R95.

If it is needed to increase the reading distance for your application, I would recommend to use either the ST25R3911B or the ST25R3916B reader device.

Rgds

BT

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
Brian TIDAL
ST Employee

Hi Sunil,

See https://community.st.com/s/question/0D53W00000HLDkKSAX/improve-rf-field-st25r95 for similar question.

Basically, Increasing power by putting 5V has benefit in the transmit path but have also impact on receive path because their is no modification on chip sensitivity and thus Tag answer may be not seen correctly.

Therefore, ST recommends to use 3.3V configuration with ST25R95.

If it is needed to increase the reading distance for your application, I would recommend to use either the ST25R3911B or the ST25R3916B reader device.

Rgds

BT

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.