Can SW4STM32 be configured to use GCC v4.9 ?

Andrew Neil · ‎2017-05-30

Posted on May 30, 2017 at 13:45

Cross-post:

http://www.openstm32.org/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?forumId=7&threadId=5150&comzone=show&sharpthreadId5150

SW4STM32 seems to come with GCC v5

Working with exported mbed projects requires GCC v4.9.

Can the SW4STM32 be configured to use GCC v4.9 ?

If so, how?

Thanks.

#eclipse #sw4stm32-eclipse #sw4stm32 #gcc #mbed

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.

Andrew Neil · ‎2017-05-30

Posted on May 30, 2017 at 15:09

I see this has been marked as an 'Action Item' - what does that actually mean?

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.

Nesrine M_O · ‎2017-05-30

Posted on May 30, 2017 at 16:05

Hi

Neil.Andrew

,

I see this has been marked as an 'Action Item' - what does that actually mean?

This means that your entry is under review.

-Nesrine-

Andrew Neil · ‎2017-05-31

Posted on May 31, 2017 at 09:15

Cross-post:

http://www.openstm32.org/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?forumId=7&comments_parentId=5150

- a 'hack' is noted as a workaround.

But this is really a Big Issue for anyone wanting to export anything for STM32 from mbed.

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.

Julien D · ‎2017-05-31

Posted on May 31, 2017 at 10:07

Hi Andrew,

2 solutions were described on OpenSTM32 forum to not stay blocked with this issue

A clean way to configure the toolchain in use within the project properties and indeed another considered as a 'hack'.

The first do the job and should be acceptable while you don't have plenty of projects to configure.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

Andrew Neil · ‎2017-05-31

Posted on May 31, 2017 at 09:02

Thanks,

ELMHIRI.Syrine

- but still unclear what that actually means.

Is that for forum moderation? Or the SW4STM32 development team? Or ...

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.

Andrew Neil · ‎2017-06-07

Posted on June 07, 2017 at 18:46

I tried tried setting the path in the Project Properties, and it didn't work - see the other thread.

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.

Julien D · ‎2017-06-09

Posted on June 09, 2017 at 11:28

Looking your System Workbench version (1.13.1) and our bugs database I confirm that the defect your are facing is fixed since 1.14.

It's time to give a chance to version 2.0 !

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

Andrew Neil · ‎2017-06-09

Posted on June 09, 2017 at 14:44

going to give v2.0 a go ...

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.
A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.