cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ST87M01 Power Sequencing: V_IO (3.3V) vs V_PMU (2.5V) Start-up

AndreasC
Associate II

I am designing a board with the ST87M01. I am using two separate LDOs (TLV757 series) both connected in parallel to a 5V VBUS source.

Rail A: 3.3V for GPIO/UART.

Rail B: 2.5V for the Modem PMU.

Since both LDOs start simultaneously, there may be a slight millisecond variation in when each rail reaches its target voltage.

Questions:

  1. Does the ST87M01 have a strict requirement for the 2.5V PMU rail to be stable before 3.3V appears on the GPIO pins?
  2. Is there a risk of latch-up or back-powering if the 3.3V rail rises ~100µs faster than the 2.5V rail?
  3. Should I implement a hardware delay (e.g., RC delay or Power-Good signal) on the 3.3V LDO Enable pin to ensure it trails the 2.5V rail?

PS. add ST87M01 label to choose in forum for topic creation. 

Greetings,

Andreas

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Didier HERROUIN
ST Employee

Dear AndreasC,

There is no constraint on the sequencing of power supplies.

And no risk of latch-up with a VIO=3.3V.

Concerning the label, thanks for your input, a "ST87 series" label has been created.

Best regards,

Didier


In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Accept as Solution' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
Didier HERROUIN
ST Employee

Dear AndreasC,

There is no constraint on the sequencing of power supplies.

And no risk of latch-up with a VIO=3.3V.

Concerning the label, thanks for your input, a "ST87 series" label has been created.

Best regards,

Didier


In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Accept as Solution' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.