cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Relationship between distance and ambient in vl53l8cx TOF sensor

JunSheng
Associate II

Does the ambient value affect the distance measurements in the VL53L8CX, or are both parameters independent of each other?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
John E KVAM
ST Employee

Just prior to turning on the VCSEL (laser) light, we take a measure of the Ambient. Then we subtract the ambient leaving us with Signal over ambient. Then we determine where the target is from that signal. 

So in theory the Ambient has no effect on the measurement. 

But in really bright light, the ambient is so strong that it saturates all of our SPADs (photon detectors). When this happens, we have no ability to 'see' the signal. 

In summary, the ambient has no effect on the measurement but it does affect how far the sensor can range. 

- john


If this or any post solves your issue, please mark them as 'Accept as Solution' It really helps. And if you notice anything wrong do not hesitate to 'Report Inappropriate Content'. Someone will review it.

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
John E KVAM
ST Employee

Just prior to turning on the VCSEL (laser) light, we take a measure of the Ambient. Then we subtract the ambient leaving us with Signal over ambient. Then we determine where the target is from that signal. 

So in theory the Ambient has no effect on the measurement. 

But in really bright light, the ambient is so strong that it saturates all of our SPADs (photon detectors). When this happens, we have no ability to 'see' the signal. 

In summary, the ambient has no effect on the measurement but it does affect how far the sensor can range. 

- john


If this or any post solves your issue, please mark them as 'Accept as Solution' It really helps. And if you notice anything wrong do not hesitate to 'Report Inappropriate Content'. Someone will review it.

Old thread... But, I wonder if one could add a narrow band 940 nm Filter as a "cover glass", to get more ambient IR rejection? I'm not sure how sharp the bandpass receive filter on the vl53l8cx is? Is that in the data sheet?

Anyway, I've done that in other cases.

(A bit off topic, but about narrow bandpass filters: While at Nokia, I had a supplier make a plastic "mirror" display cover, by using quite narrow RGB bandpass filters that very closely matched the RGB LED peak wavelengths, and it worked great! )

RogerM
ST Employee

FYI. The VL53L5/7/8 family of devices already include a good quality 940nm bandpass filter as part of the lens that sits in front of the SPAD array.  So although you might be able to make a small improvement I don't think it would be significant.

Lohi
Associate III

There's the answer, at least in a "qualitative" way.  ;-}

The SPAD detectors are, i think, fairly broadband, so that the filter has a big effect on ambient saturation...Because the emitter has almost zero bandwidth, one can use a very narrow filter, trying to get the so-called "laser focus" on the bandeidth ... Without knowing the bandwidth of the existing filter, it's difficult to calculate actual performance change.
Lohi
Associate III

So. Just how good?

Do you have a spectral response?

Here's an example of a relatively narrowband 940 nm Filter, about $2.00 in 10 mm square size

940 nm Filter_960x960.png

I've done quite a bit of work with sensors, emitters and filters (did my first LED reflective sensor design in 1977, and a lot more synchronization of sensor/emitter in time and spectrum, including global r&d @Nokia, so I'm quite interested in in-depth study... Hmmm... Would it be possible to (de-)synchronize these sensors with external light sources, like trigger a reading during the off-time of a PWM'd emitter, or a low-output point of a line-powered source??)