2026-04-14 3:46 AM - last edited on 2026-04-14 3:53 AM by Andrew Neil
Split from STM32WB05KNV6TR missing in STM32CubeIDE 2.0.0 Target Selector - this is a new question
Hi Ghofrane,
Thank you for the explanation. Since the WB05xN acts as a network coprocessor, it doesn't fit my current design goals as I want to avoid using an external Host MCU to keep the BOM cost and PCB footprint at a minimum.
I am looking for a standalone (single-chip) STM32 wireless solution. My requirements are:
Standalone Operation: The application and BLE stack must run on the same chip.
Eddystone Support: It must be capable of broadcasting in Eddystone format.
FOTA (Firmware Over-the-Air): The chip must support wireless firmware updates.
Cost-Effective: This is a price-sensitive project, so I am looking for the most budget-friendly standalone option in the STM32WB family.
Could you please suggest the most suitable part number for this use case? Would the STM32WB15 or the new STM32WB09 be the right direction for a low-cost, standalone beacon application?
2026-04-30 3:46 PM - edited 2026-04-30 3:48 PM
Hello @burak_Guzeller ,
Using "STM32 Sidekick", I think STM32WB09xE is your best direction and most suitable for your requirements (standalone BLE operation, Eddystone support, FOTA, and cost-effectiveness).
Here is the summary result from "STM32 Sidekick":
STM32WB0 series - Bluetooth® Low Energy 5.4 communications in a compact, energy-efficient design
I encourage you to use "STM32 Sidekick", it assists you in finding suitable information by comparing STM32 devices to help you select the appropriate part number.
For more information regarding how to use STM32 Sidekick, please see: How to use STM32 Sidekick.