Posted on March 20, 2017 at 18:24Going through HAL code, I see this
static HAL_StatusTypeDef I2C_SlaveTransmit_TXE(I2C_HandleTypeDef *hi2c)
{
/* Declaration of temporary variables to prevent undefined behavior of volatile usage */
uint32_t CurrentState = hi2c->State;
if(hi2c->XferCount != 0U)
{
/* Write data to DR */
hi2c->Instance->DR = (*hi2c->pBuffPtr++);
hi2c->XferCount--;
if((hi2c->XferCount == 0U) && (CurrentState == HAL_I2C_STATE_BUSY_TX_LISTEN))
{
/* Last Byte is received, disable Interrupt */
__HAL_I2C_DISABLE_IT(hi2c, I2C_IT_BUF);
/* Set state at HAL_I2C_STATE_LISTEN */
hi2c->PreviousState = I2C_STATE_SLAVE_BUSY_TX;
hi2c->State = HAL_I2C_STATE_LISTEN;
/* Call the Tx complete callback to inform upper layer of the end of receive process */
HAL_I2C_SlaveTxCpltCallback(hi2c);
}
}
return HAL_OK;
I am not sure how this approaches the problem with multiple bytes. Since it is just 'if statements', wouldn't that mean I would need it an interrupt to occur for each byte?
