cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Switching frequency

PZha.1
Associate III

HI Sir,

the switching frequency below input 24V 0.04A output 12V

is that normal.

L7987-DB54-24V004AC2.png

 the switching frequency below, input 24V 0.01A output 12V

L7987-DB54-24V0.01A1.png

the switching frequency below input 24V 0.33A output 12V

L7987-DB54-24V0.33C1.png

 the circuit see below:

PZha1_0-1739882991507.png

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Well, as mentioned, the L7987 can certainly supply 3A. The L7987 has a so-called light-load management for low outputs (see data sheet, section 4.3), but with 0.3% or 1.2% you are well below the lower limit. In this respect, the observed signals can certainly be regarded as realistic.

Regards
/Peter

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
Peter BENSCH
ST Employee

You didn't mention which switching regulator you currently have, but I'm guessing the L7987?

Why wouldn't the switching waveforms be ok - the L7987 can deliver 3A and is slightly underpowered at 0.01A?

Regards
/Peter

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

HI Peter,

Yes, the regulator is L7987 you can see it from the schematic

L7987 is used in each of our products, it's about 12K per year.

PZha1_0-1740045021143.png

I don't know why the switching frequency looks abnormal sometimes at light load.

any suggestion.

thanks,

With best regards,

PZha

 

 

 

 

 

PZha.1
Associate III

HI Peter,

 

The switching frequency is 641KHz  after Change the FSW resistor from 47K to 33K

iPZha1_0-1740061785368.png

PZha1_1-1740061804200.png

seems better than 520KHz 

 

 

Well, as mentioned, the L7987 can certainly supply 3A. The L7987 has a so-called light-load management for low outputs (see data sheet, section 4.3), but with 0.3% or 1.2% you are well below the lower limit. In this respect, the observed signals can certainly be regarded as realistic.

Regards
/Peter

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
PZha.1
Associate III

HI Peter, thanks for your great support.

With best regards, PZha