cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

RBO40

Padg
Associate

Hello,

I am trying to build a power supply to power a vehicle tracker.  Can I use two RBO40 in series, so the output of first RBO40 connected to input of second RBO40?  Reason, when a thief steals a vehicle they want to stop the tracker working and sending out GPS coordinates, and quickly.  If they find the tracker's power cable but cannot find tracker because they are quickly working in a public area like a car park they might consider using high voltage like connecting up to 230volts to kill the tracker.  While we can never be sure what actions the attacker will do my thinking is the first RBO40 will be toast and assuming it has created an open circuit, the second RBO40 will continue to ensure nothing bad happens to the battery backed tracker.

Putting the above scenario aside, and it isn't my question because there are too many ifs and buts, my question to ST Community is can I safely use two RBO40 in series for about $2-4 to protect $200-400 of components?

Thanks.

1 REPLY 1
Peter BENSCH
ST Employee

Well, your scenario doesn't work because the RBO40 have a peak load dump voltage of 80V. If you apply 230V between two RBO40s connected in series, there will be a big bang and both RBO40 including the tracker will be fried - but also the vehicle that is (or was) connected before the first RBO40.

The more you want to protect the tracker, the more you have to rely on its complete autonomy, e.g. with integrated batteries and a housing that is as burglar-proof as possible and is attached to the vehicle as stably as possible (e.g. welded on?). It would also be conceivable to deactivate the tracker via Bluetooth so that it does not send any coordinates when it detects movement (via MEMS) if it is being used legally. With a stainless steel housing, the thief would have a while to grind or saw it open. But how do you get both the Bluetooth and GSM antennas outside without the thief recognizing and destroying them?

Whatever you do - if the cost of the theft protection is significantly higher than the object to be protected, there is probably no point in doing so.

Hope that helps?

Regards
/Peter

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.