2018-05-24 01:07 AM
Could you propose to me a very low power 16-bit MCU, please?
2018-05-24 01:22 AM
Hi
aziz.moez
,http://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers.html
contains a comprehensive range of microcontrollers, from low-cost 8-bit MCUs up to 32-bit Arm
®-based Cortex®-M0 and M0+, Cortex®-M3,Cortex®-M4 and Cortex®-M7 Flash microcontrollers.
If you are looking for
low power MCU, I recommend the .-Nesrine-
2018-05-24 01:23 AM
Hello,
ST doesn't have 16-bit devices in MCUs portfolio. You can consider using either 8-bit MCUs (
http://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers/stm8-8-bit-mcus.html?querycriteria=productId=SC1244
family) or 32-bit MCUs (http://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers/stm32-32-bit-arm-cortex-mcus.html
family).Both STM8 and STM32 families have low-power series:
- from STM8 there are STM8L and STM8AL series- from STM32 there are STM32L0, STM32L1, STM32L4 and STM32L4+ seriesRegards
Szymon2018-05-24 01:39 AM
TI has low-power variants of their MSP430 controllers.
Could you propose to me a very low power 16-bit MCU, please?
Limiting yourself to a certain architectural characteristic is contra-productive. There are no specific advantages of 16 bit MCUs over 32 bit MCUs - rather the other way around.
2018-05-24 04:25 AM
'
There are no specific advantages of 16 bit MCUs over 32 bit MCU'
Code density? Simplicity? Existing code base? Tookchain? ...
The cortex m is basically a 16bit like MCU. And the L variant has fairly good performance.
2018-05-24 04:36 AM
You should have included the rest in the quote - rather the other way around.
Structural quirks and size limitations actually make 8 and 16 bit MCUs less code size efficient. With 16 bit, you can only address 64kByte. If you exceed this limit, you need an additional offset. The MSP430 loses >20% performance with 'long addresses'.
Pretty sure this is all about price. And a 8 bit or 16 bit MCU is not automatically cheaper than a 32 bit MCU.