Hi everyone,
I’m working on a small tool idea around STM32 / Cortex-M debugging, and I’d like honest feedback before building too much.
The problem I’m trying to validate is this:
When a Cortex-M firmware crashes into HardFault_Handler, many students, junior developers, and even intermediate embedded developers struggle to understand what actually happened. The data is usually there — CFSR, HFSR, BFAR, MMFAR, stacked PC, LR/EXC_RETURN, stack frame, GDB logs — but interpreting it correctly is not always obvious.
The idea is not to build another IDE or replace STM32CubeIDE, VS Code, Ozone, or GDB.
The first version would be an offline analyzer:
input: .elf file, GDB log, register dump, stack dump
output: a clear report explaining the probable fault cause, source line if available, decoded fault registers, and suggested next checks
Example use case:
firmware crashes into HardFault
developer copies the relevant GDB/register dump
tool generates a readable diagnostic report
I’m especially interested in whether this would be useful for:
STM32 learners
embedded training centers
university labs
junior firmware developers
small teams without a Cortex-M debug expert
A few questions:
When you hit a HardFault on STM32/Cortex-M, how do you debug it today?
Do tools like Ozone, CubeIDE, Cortex-Debug, or your own scripts already solve this well enough?
Would a readable diagnostic report save time, or is this not a real pain point?
Would this be more useful as:
For educators: would structured HardFault/BusFault exercises be useful in embedded courses?
I’m not trying to sell anything at this stage. I’m trying to understand whether the problem is real enough before investing more development time.
Brutally honest feedback is welcome.
