FAQs
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

STM32F410 RM DMA table contains nonexistent DAC2

waclawek.jan
Guru

‎2024-07-07 02:35 AM

waclawekjan_0-1720344488338.png

Also, the only DAC pin marking is so sloppy that this can be found on one single page:

waclawekjan_1-1720344682217.png

I'd recommend to go through all DAC-containg DSs and RMs and unify nomenclature. It's okay (and IMO preferrable) to call the single DAC module DAC1 and its single pin DAC1_OUT1, as long as it's consistent across all DS and RM. Similarly, the DMA request signal's name shall consistently reflect that it comes from the 1st subunit of 1st unit (DAC1_1 or similar).

JW

Labels:
1 REPLY 1
STTwo-32
ST Employee

‎2024-07-07 06:51 AM - edited ‎2024-07-08 07:20 AM

Hello @waclawek.jan 

Thank you so much for sharing this typo with as. I will escalate it to our Doc team for correction under internal ticket number 186028. For the naming recommendations, I will escalate it to the same team.

Best Regards.

STTwo-32 

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on Accept as Solution on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.

Top