Skip to main content
Associate
August 25, 2026
Question

STM32H573 SFI (without Secure Manager) fails at Area 2 with error 0xFFEB0FB3 – "Failed to Process Area Number 70"

  • August 25, 2026
  • 2 replies
  • 54 views

Environment

  • MCU: STM32H573 (custom board)
  • STM32CubeProgrammer & STM32 Trusted Package Creator: v2.23.0 (same version)
  • X-CUBE-RSSe: installed (RSSe SFI binary v3.1.0, RSS v2.2.0)
  • License: ST HSM (hsm=1, slot=1)
  • Boot: custom OEM bootloader (OEM-iRoT), not STiRoT / not mcuboot
  • Connection: Hotplug

What I'm doing I'm evaluating SFI without Secure Manager, installing my own firmware into internal secure flash. TrustZone is enabled (TZEN=0xB4), and my final option bytes (CSV) set:

  • BOOT_UBE = 0xB4 (OEM-iRoT)
  • SECBOOTADD = 0xC0000 (0x0C000000)
  • SECWM1 = 0x00–0x7F, SECWM2 = 0x00–0x7F (all secure)

Memory layout (secure alias 0x0C000000):

File Address Size
1.bin 0x0C000000 22.2 KB
2.bin  0x0C008000 ~813 KB total
3.bin 0x0C0F7FA0 80 B
4.bin 0x0C0F8000 32 B
5.bin 0x0C1F8000 5.6 KB

Behavior The SFI process starts correctly:

  • License processed OK
  • Image header processed OK
  • Area 1 (type H) processed OK
  • Fails at Area 2 with:
Error: Execution of RSS CMD failed, returned value = 0xFFEB0FB3
Error: Failed to Process Area Number 70 of type (type field is blank)

After failure, PRODUCT_STATE stays at 0x17 (Provisioning), and I can only recover debug access after a full power cycle.

What I have already checked / ruled out

  • Encryption Key and Nonce are identical between the HSM programming and the SFI image generation.
  • Firmware binaries are rebuilt for the secure address (0x0C000000), format is .bin with addresses assigned in TPC.
  • CSV option bytes are correct (verified in the intermediate log; BOOT_UBE=0xB4 and SECBOOTADD=0xC0000 match).
  • No address overlap (total image is only ~813 KB).
  • I regenerate a fresh .sfi (new filename) every time.

Questions

  1. What does the return value 0xFFEB0FB3 indicate, and why does the failure report "Area Number 70 of type (blank)" when only ~13 areas exist? This looks like a corrupted/unexpected area descriptor.
  2. For a custom OEM-iRoT (no STiRoT, no Secure Manager), is there any additional requirement for the first firmware area at 0x0C000000 (e.g. alignment, reserved header, OBK provisioning) that I might be missing?
  3. Are there known incompatibilities between TPC-generated SFI images (Protocol version 2) and the RSSe SFI binary version that could cause this area-parsing failure?

Any guidance on how to interpret this error code and where to look next would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

2 replies

KA15Author
Associate
August 27, 2026

This reason that no obk file.

Aziz BRIGUI
ST Technical Moderator
September 2, 2026

Hi ​@KA15,

Did you manage to resolve the issue by adding the .obk file ? If yes, please select your comment as best answer so that people encountering the same issue can easily find an answer.

Aziz

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Accept as Solution' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.