Skip to main content
Associate
August 25, 2026
Question

STM32H573 SFI (without Secure Manager) fails at Area 2 with error 0xFFEB0FB3 – "Failed to Process Area Number 70"

  • August 25, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 28 views

Environment

  • MCU: STM32H573 (custom board)
  • STM32CubeProgrammer & STM32 Trusted Package Creator: v2.23.0 (same version)
  • X-CUBE-RSSe: installed (RSSe SFI binary v3.1.0, RSS v2.2.0)
  • License: ST HSM (hsm=1, slot=1)
  • Boot: custom OEM bootloader (OEM-iRoT), not STiRoT / not mcuboot
  • Connection: Hotplug

What I'm doing I'm evaluating SFI without Secure Manager, installing my own firmware into internal secure flash. TrustZone is enabled (TZEN=0xB4), and my final option bytes (CSV) set:

  • BOOT_UBE = 0xB4 (OEM-iRoT)
  • SECBOOTADD = 0xC0000 (0x0C000000)
  • SECWM1 = 0x00–0x7F, SECWM2 = 0x00–0x7F (all secure)

Memory layout (secure alias 0x0C000000):

File Address Size
1.bin 0x0C000000 22.2 KB
2.bin  0x0C008000 ~813 KB total
3.bin 0x0C0F7FA0 80 B
4.bin 0x0C0F8000 32 B
5.bin 0x0C1F8000 5.6 KB

Behavior The SFI process starts correctly:

  • License processed OK
  • Image header processed OK
  • Area 1 (type H) processed OK
  • Fails at Area 2 with:
Error: Execution of RSS CMD failed, returned value = 0xFFEB0FB3
Error: Failed to Process Area Number 70 of type (type field is blank)

After failure, PRODUCT_STATE stays at 0x17 (Provisioning), and I can only recover debug access after a full power cycle.

What I have already checked / ruled out

  • Encryption Key and Nonce are identical between the HSM programming and the SFI image generation.
  • Firmware binaries are rebuilt for the secure address (0x0C000000), format is .bin with addresses assigned in TPC.
  • CSV option bytes are correct (verified in the intermediate log; BOOT_UBE=0xB4 and SECBOOTADD=0xC0000 match).
  • No address overlap (total image is only ~813 KB).
  • I regenerate a fresh .sfi (new filename) every time.

Questions

  1. What does the return value 0xFFEB0FB3 indicate, and why does the failure report "Area Number 70 of type (blank)" when only ~13 areas exist? This looks like a corrupted/unexpected area descriptor.
  2. For a custom OEM-iRoT (no STiRoT, no Secure Manager), is there any additional requirement for the first firmware area at 0x0C000000 (e.g. alignment, reserved header, OBK provisioning) that I might be missing?
  3. Are there known incompatibilities between TPC-generated SFI images (Protocol version 2) and the RSSe SFI binary version that could cause this area-parsing failure?

Any guidance on how to interpret this error code and where to look next would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

1 reply

KA15Author
Associate
August 27, 2026

This reason that no obk file.