STM32CubeMX work is too slow.

[Vyacheslav Azarov]

Posted on December 27, 2015 at 19:31

STM32CubeMX is very useful program.

Only too slow, on my computers.

Each click is delaying work on a lot of seconds.

My computers use AMD Athlon & E1 processors.

This is not enough? What should I do?

Everything happens for so long that it impossible to work!

Thank you.

#stm32cubemx

[Tesla DeLorean]

Posted on December 27, 2015 at 20:28

The E1's have some pretty horrific performance numbers, I like AMD, but a lot of their low-end offerings in the last year or two have been non-competitive.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+E1-1200+APU

A six year old off-lease Intel box costing a few hundred dollars

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+E5530+%40+2.40GHz&id=1244

[Vyacheslav Azarov]

Posted on December 28, 2015 at 20:06

Yes it is not the best processors. But other programs work well.

It may be a problem in the interpretation of Java, these processors.

Although Eclipse works well. This is strange. Thank's.

[Tesla DeLorean]

Posted on December 28, 2015 at 23:30

Well I suspect it's a combination of JVM, and the priority being the speed in coding rather than execution. I don't think we're dealing with algorithm guys, or any QA being done on sub-optimal hardware.

I do a lot of my work on AMD Netbooks (C50/C60) which are very convenient, run Win7 x64 with 8GB, and have virtualization. Not rockets, but serviceable and grab-n-go type devices. An Apple Air device would be ideal if it wouldn't get broken or stolen.

I once tried to use Atmel Studio on them, and it was just awful. Realistically any of this ''scripted'' stuff is going to need an A8 or better.

[Vyacheslav Azarov]

Posted on December 29, 2015 at 15:39

Very sorry. Buy a new computer for a single application, it is too much.

Thank you.