Is anybody at STM dealing with STM32CubeIDE ?

[MikeDB]

I've posted a couple of possible bugs and so have lots of other people and I've yet to see a single response to any question by an STM employee. The video makes it seem like the next best thing, and the IDE you'll be supporting preferentially, but this cannot be further from the truth at the moment.

[Dave Nadler]

I haven't been able to get it to work at all, posted a couple bugs yesterday, no response, Aaarrrggg....

[S.Ma]

Be patient. The new forum scrolls down and away posts very fast...

[MikeDB]

Yes - STM32CubeIDE probably needs its own heading so that doesn't happen. But I'll keep this near the top until I get an STM answer, which may involve an email to Mr Chery.

[Amel NASRI]

Hello,

@Markus GIRDLAND​ is active in this space and he is managing to answer question, just be patient ;)

-Amel

[Markus GIRDLAND]

Thank you Amel,

Yes, I'm answering as fast as I can to most posts but some requires some research and/or testing to validate if I should make a ticket or not so it takes some time.

And as Amel already noted, please add STM32CubeIDE to your questions if you want me to find it.

Thank you for your understanding!

[Amel NASRI]

One more comment: please use the topic "STM32CubeIDE" when submitting your questions so that it will appear in its dedicated space monitored by Markus.

-Amel

[MikeDB]

Do you mean in the header ? In which case I always include that as part of the title name and haven't received a single response.

You don't seem to have a tag system like StackOverflow to make sure things get to the right people.

Apparently STM people are saying this product is going to revolutionise embedded software development. I think they are sort of right - I'm on the point of going to another MCU vendor unless I can get repeatable reliable results from STM's packages.

[Amel NASRI]

It is not the header, I am speaking about the topics (or tags) that you can assign to your question (at the bottom of question submission form).