Skip to main content
Senior
Sep 14, 2026 9:28 PM UTC
Solved

User experience of QtNanoBrowser

I have heard that ST have tried QtNanoBrowser on the MP257 and according to them the web browser is working well.

My question is if there are any more additional information about the user experience of QtNanoBrowser on the MP257?

For example a benchmark and which pages did run smoothly and which pages took long time to load.

WindowsBest answer
Senior
Oct 18, 2026 10:52 PM UTC

I have tried QtNanoBrowser now.

It works very well on the MP2.

Not the fastest, but Youtube works.

I think ST could make some optimization for this web browser e.g better hardware acceleration and better drivers for WebGL.

The classical WebGL Fish Tank gives 5 FPS for 500 fish. Youtube work for mobile resolution e.g 200-500p.

I have made a meta layer for a web browser that fits OpenSTLinux.

 

1 reply

WindowsAuthorBest answer
Senior
Oct 18, 2026 10:52 PM UTC

I have tried QtNanoBrowser now.

It works very well on the MP2.

Not the fastest, but Youtube works.

I think ST could make some optimization for this web browser e.g better hardware acceleration and better drivers for WebGL.

The classical WebGL Fish Tank gives 5 FPS for 500 fish. Youtube work for mobile resolution e.g 200-500p.

I have made a meta layer for a web browser that fits OpenSTLinux.