Skip to main content
Associate
July 2, 2026
Solved

Review replicated design and feedback

  • July 2, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 82 views

I have replicated the MB1936 Schematic for a dash-cam system based on the MP257FAIx series by choosing the relevant circuits from the reference to design my custom PCB. I would love to seek help from the community for the following requirement. If anything pops up my mind, I shall update on this thread - 

  1. Can I use the 5-pin MOLEX/JST GH Signal Connectors to interface the Waveshare IMX335 USB Camera Module? I have used the USB Host Port Architecture to implement my logic, and it has worked well. 

Kindly find the Schematics PDF for your reference. Thank You!

Best answer by ZAKARIA_C1

Hello ​@JaganSI,
 

Based on official Waveshare documentation, the IMX335 5MP USB Camera module actually uses an SH1.0 5-pin connector, not a GH-type connector.
This is an important distinction because JST SH and JST GH connectors, despite the similar naming, have different pin pitches (SH = 1.0mm, GH = 1.25mm) and are mechanically incompatible you cannot mate a GH plug into an SH receptacle or vice versa.

Key Points for Your Design

  • Confirm the exact connector on your Waveshare module is JST SH 1.0mm pitch, 5-pin, before finalizing your PCB footprint.

  • If your MB1936-derived schematic and PCB were designed around JST GH (1.25mm pitch) footprints, they will not physically mate with the Waveshare camera's SH1.0 connector you'll need either the correct SH1.0 mating connector on your board, or a custom adapter cable/pigtail to convert between the two pitches.

  • Functionally, the 5-pin signal set for these USB camera modules is typically VBUS, D-, D+, GND, and sometimes a shield/ID line so once the mechanical connector is correct, wiring the USB host port logic you've already implemented should work the same way.

  • Double check with Waveshare's product page or datasheet for your exact camera variant (A, B, or C series), since pinout and connector type can vary slightly between hardware revisions.

If your custom PCB currently has JST GH footprints, the simplest fix is either resourcing the connector to JST SH1.0 , or sourcing a short JST-GH-to-JST-SH adapter/pigtail cable so you don't need to redesign the board.


Best Regards,
Zakaria

3 replies

ZAKARIA_C1Best answer
ST Employee
July 2, 2026

Hello ​@JaganSI,
 

Based on official Waveshare documentation, the IMX335 5MP USB Camera module actually uses an SH1.0 5-pin connector, not a GH-type connector.
This is an important distinction because JST SH and JST GH connectors, despite the similar naming, have different pin pitches (SH = 1.0mm, GH = 1.25mm) and are mechanically incompatible you cannot mate a GH plug into an SH receptacle or vice versa.

Key Points for Your Design

  • Confirm the exact connector on your Waveshare module is JST SH 1.0mm pitch, 5-pin, before finalizing your PCB footprint.

  • If your MB1936-derived schematic and PCB were designed around JST GH (1.25mm pitch) footprints, they will not physically mate with the Waveshare camera's SH1.0 connector you'll need either the correct SH1.0 mating connector on your board, or a custom adapter cable/pigtail to convert between the two pitches.

  • Functionally, the 5-pin signal set for these USB camera modules is typically VBUS, D-, D+, GND, and sometimes a shield/ID line so once the mechanical connector is correct, wiring the USB host port logic you've already implemented should work the same way.

  • Double check with Waveshare's product page or datasheet for your exact camera variant (A, B, or C series), since pinout and connector type can vary slightly between hardware revisions.

If your custom PCB currently has JST GH footprints, the simplest fix is either resourcing the connector to JST SH1.0 , or sourcing a short JST-GH-to-JST-SH adapter/pigtail cable so you don't need to redesign the board.


Best Regards,
Zakaria

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Best answer' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
JaganSIAuthor
Associate
July 9, 2026

Thank You, Zakaria for your help! If it is not a big ask, would you mind giving us a review of the schematic? The comments from your end can prove useful for us in further development. 

 

Best Regards,

Jagannathan 

Visitor II
July 3, 2026

Hello Zakaria,

Thank you for review feedback on connector, we will work on same, but parallely, please share review comments on schematic, which will help us take it further.

 

Thank you & Best Regards,

Prashant

 

Visitor II
July 15, 2026

Hello Team, Good day!

 

Hope everyone doing well!

 

Now almost 12 days, but unable to get any answer related to our support requirement thread started with this.

 

So shall I wait or explore other options by removing STM32 series from my current development projects, which we have selected?

 

Thank you,

Prashant Mulay

Visitor II
July 15, 2026

My apologies, unable to understand, how this ticket is solved, what is logical conclusion?