Skip to main content
asadullah4571
Associate III
June 26, 2026
Question

Clarification Required: DRAM Block B Necessity with Micron MT53E1G32D2FW 4GB LPDDR4 on STM32MP257

  • June 26, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 16 views

Dear Team,

I hope this email finds you well.

 

I am writing to seek your expert clarification on a critical hardware design decision we are currently evaluating for our STM32MP257-based custom board.

 

 

 

--- Current Memory Configuration ---

 

• SoC         : STM32MP257

• Memory Part : Micron MT53E1G32D2FW-046 WT:C

• Type        : LPDDR4

• Density     : 32 Gbit (4 GB)

• Organization: 1 x32 (Dual Channel — Channel A + Channel B)

 

--- Our Understanding from ST Documentation ---

 

Based on our research of the following official ST documents:

 

1. AN5723 (Rev 3, Aug 2024) :

   "Interface width is 32-bit when full-populated, or 16-bit when half-populated."

 

2. AN5724 — DDR Routing Guide:

   "For the 16-bit LPDDR4 interface, one 16-bit LPDDR4 is used in point-to-point connection. With this configuration it can drive up to 2 Gbyte memory."

 

3. AN5489 (Rev 6, Sep 2025) :

   STM32MP257 supports both 16-bit (half-populated) and 32-bit (full-populated) LPDDR4 configurations.

 

Our understanding is:

• If using a native x16 LPDDR4 device → DRAM_B is NOT required (half-populated, 2 GB)

• If using our current 1x32 device (Micron MT53E1G32D2FW) → DRAM_B IS required (full-populated, 4 GB), since it is a dual-channel x32 device that needs both Channel A and Channel B connected simultaneously

 

--- Clarification Requested ---

 

Could you kindly confirm or correct the following:

 

1. With our current Micron MT53E1G32D2FW (x32, 4 GB) device, is it safe and supported to leave DRAM_B  unconnected?

 

2. If DRAM_B can be left unconnected with this x32 device, would the DDR PHY training still pass successfully at boot?

 

3. If DRAM_B must be connected for this specific device, would switching to a x16 LPDDR4 device (e.g., Micron MT53E1G16D2FW) be the correct approach to eliminate DRAM_B routing?

 

This clarification is critical for us before we proceed with PCB routing, as it directly impacts our layer stack-up, routing complexity, and BOM decisions.

 

Thank you very much for your time and guidance. We look forward to your expert advice.

1 reply

Associate II
June 30, 2026

Hi ​@asadullah4571 

Why use MT53E1G32D2FW-046 WT:C?

They are out of stock at the moment.

 

By the way! I purchased a MT53E1G32D2FW-046 WT:C from Aliexpress, but I could only use 2 GB. It's working very well.