Skip to main content
SilentButeo2
Associate
September 17, 2026
Solved

STM32WB15CC Rev Z / FUS 2.2.x – Is it possible to make the full 32 KB SRAM2a available to CPU1?

  • September 17, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 72 views

We are seeing different SRAM2a availability between STM32WB15CC devices with different silicon/FUS revisions.

On our older STM32WB15CC devices (silicon Rev B), the device has FUS version 1.2.2.0. On these devices, BRSD_A is set, so the complete 32 KB SRAM2a region (0x20030000–0x20037FFF) is non-secure and available to CPU1.

On newer STM32WB15CC devices (silicon Rev Z), we see FUS version 2.2.0.1. On these devices, the relevant configuration is:

  • BRSD_A = 0
  • SBRSA_A = 0x1A
  • Secure SRAM2a therefore starts at 0x20036800
  • SFSA = 0x8C, corresponding to 0x08046000
  • SBR = 0x1180

As a result, only 26 KB of SRAM2a (0x20030000–0x200367FF) appears to be available to CPU1, while the upper 6 KB is secure.

There is no wireless stack installed, and our application does not use the wireless stack/CPU2 functionality.

Our existing production firmware requires the full 32 KB SRAM2a. Reducing the linker region to 26 KB is therefore not a viable workaround.

This has become a production-critical issue for us: our existing units using Rev B devices work correctly, but the newer Rev Z devices currently cannot be used with our production firmware.

For comparison:

Working production devices

  • STM32WB15CC Rev B
  • FUS: 1.2.2.0
  • Full 32 KB SRAM2a available to CPU1
  • BRSD_A = 1

New devices

  • STM32WB15CC Rev Z
  • FUS: 2.2.0.1
  • BRSD_A = 0
  • SBRSA_A = 0x1A
  • Only 26 KB SRAM2a available to CPU1

Is there an officially supported way to make the full 32 KB SRAM2a available to CPU1 on the Rev Z / FUS 2.2.x devices when no wireless stack or CPU2 functionality is used?

Best answer by Imen.D

Hello ​@SilentButeo2 ,

This request can be closed, as we have identified that a duplicate internal ticket has already been created for you by our FAE.

Your question will be followed up and supported internally by our technical expert.

Thank you for your understanding.

1 reply

Imen.DBest answer
ST Technical Moderator
September 24, 2026

Hello ​@SilentButeo2 ,

This request can be closed, as we have identified that a duplicate internal ticket has already been created for you by our FAE.

Your question will be followed up and supported internally by our technical expert.

Thank you for your understanding.

In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Best answer' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question. Thanks