Skip to main content
Associate
March 12, 2025
Solved

VREF+ on the STM32H743VIT6

  • March 12, 2025
  • 3 replies
  • 1136 views

Hello,

This is the first time I'm working with an STM32 and I have a question regarding the VREF+ pin. I'm creating a schematic for the MCU and I'm not entirely sure what to do with the VREF+ pin and I'd like some clarification on something. According to the datasheet, the connection between VDDA and VREF+ depends on the package type. I'll be using the 100-LQFP package and if I've read the datasheet correctly, that means that VDDA and VREF+ are internally connected? So I can just leave the VREF+ pin floating and still have access to VREF? Or would it still be best to apply a filtered voltage to the VREF+ pin externally? I have a filtered voltage supply to the VDDA pin already in the schematic and am I right in saying that if I have read the datasheet correctly, then there is no need to add another filtered voltage externally to VREF+, correct? Thanks.

Best answer by STOne-32

Dear @felron124 ,

 

The shared schematics sounds good with enough filtering versus Digital VDD. VDDA and VREF+ connected to same isolated +3,3VA which is a minimum to have standard ADC accuracy and performance.  if ADC is not required VDD/VDDA/VREF+ can be the same rail as well.

Ciao

STOne-32.

3 replies

Senior III
March 12, 2025

Even though it is internally connected to VDDA, it's not recommended to leave VREF+ floating. You should connect it to VDDA externally with a decoupling capacitor (typically 1µF + 100nF to VSSA) for stability.

felron124Author
Associate
March 12, 2025

Ok, so something like the following?

Side note: does the VDDA and VREF+ always have to be supplied with a stable 3.3v or would the 3.3v input on the VDD pins suffice for applications where the ADC isn't important? Thanks.

VREF+ and VDDA:

felron124_0-1741809966135.png

VDDA filter circutry:

felron124_3-1741810191090.png

VSSA:

felron124_2-1741810075821.png

 

STOne-32
Technical Moderator
March 12, 2025

Dear @felron124 ,

 

Welcome in STCommunity, as you have Package 100, I highly recommend to read this application note that explains the package effect on performance/ resolution: https://www.st.com/resource/en/application_note/dm00628458-getting-started-with-the-stm32h7-series-mcu-16bit-adc-stmicroelectronics.pdf

Chapter 3 is key and then next chapters .

VREF+ has a direct impact on  ADC values accuracy . chapter 6.4 for recommendations.

Hope it helps you .

 

STOne-32

felron124Author
Associate
March 12, 2025

Ok, I'll make sure to read it carefully. Thank you for the help.

STOne-32
STOne-32Best answer
Technical Moderator
March 12, 2025

Dear @felron124 ,

 

The shared schematics sounds good with enough filtering versus Digital VDD. VDDA and VREF+ connected to same isolated +3,3VA which is a minimum to have standard ADC accuracy and performance.  if ADC is not required VDD/VDDA/VREF+ can be the same rail as well.

Ciao

STOne-32.

mƎALLEm
Technical Moderator
March 12, 2025

Hello


@felron124 wrote:

Hello,

I'll be using the 100-LQFP package and if I've read the datasheet correctly, that means that VDDA and VREF+ are internally connected? 


According to the datasheet Vref+ is available on the LQFP100 package:

 

mALLEm_3-1741813766884.png

 

For the hardware design need to refer to the hardware getting started related to the product. In your case: the AN4938:

This is STM32H753XI reference schematic in the AN4938:

mALLEm_1-1741813483265.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click "Best answer" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
felron124Author
Associate
March 12, 2025

Ah, that document will be very useful. Thank you.