Skip to main content
Best answer by KDJEM.1

Hello @waclawek.jan @Andrew Neil ,

 

Thank you for bringing these typos to our attention.

I reported these typos and your feedback internally.

Internal ticket number CDM0062312 (This is an internal tracking number and is not accessible or usable by customers).  

 

Thank you.

Kaouthar

3 replies

Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil
Super User
May 1, 2026

It has always seemed to me that having that text which simply repeats the title of the table verbatim is entirely pointless!

Just remove it - it adds no value, and is just a burden to update!

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.
    waclawek.jan
    waclawek.janAuthor
    Super User
    May 1, 2026

    +1, simply removing it is the right solution IMO; and already used in some chapters here and most in the newer RMs.

    There's an amazing variability between how this subchapter is arranged for the various peripherals, including the presence/absence, accompanying text and positiononing of the link to the memory map chapter with the boundary addresses.

    JW

      KDJEM.1
      KDJEM.1Best answer
      ST Technical Moderator
      May 4, 2026

      Hello @waclawek.jan @Andrew Neil ,

       

      Thank you for bringing these typos to our attention.

      I reported these typos and your feedback internally.

      Internal ticket number CDM0062312 (This is an internal tracking number and is not accessible or usable by customers).  

       

      Thank you.

      Kaouthar

      To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Best answer" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement