Skip to main content
This topic has been closed for replies.

3 replies

Andrew Neil
Super User
November 5, 2010
Posted on November 05, 2010 at 23:39

Yes - it is pretty daft, isn't it?!

If you look carefully at the left of this photo, you can see that I adopted exactly the solution as you:

http://www.facebook.com/!/photo.php?fbid=163183327040308&set=a.1627518604167356107434509281857&pid=406728&id=107434509281857

Here's a close-up:

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.
datac99
Visitor II
November 12, 2010
Posted on November 12, 2010 at 07:16

Not what I would call ''protoboard friendly'' for sure... But it wouldn't really be a big deal to lop the P3 pins off since they are not going to be mating anyway.

Just a thought :)

Andrew Neil
Super User
November 12, 2010
Posted on November 12, 2010 at 08:08

Still a pain if you actually wanted to use those pins...

Yes, the easiest ''fix'' for ST (without re-spinning the board) would be to simply not fit those pins.
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work.