Skip to main content
Tamas Novak
Tamas Novak
Associate III
May 13, 2017 7:48 AM UTC
Solved

mx configuration report

Posted on May 13, 2017 at 09:48

A minor bug in STM32CubeMX 4.21.0 (Win7, Adobe Reader 2017):

pin names don't fit in generated report PDF when 'locating stake' for user label is used. See attached screenshot

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Jeanne Joly
    Jeanne JolyBest answer
    Associate
    Jan 16, 2018 1:15 PM UTC
    Posted on January 16, 2018 at 14:15

    Hello

    Novak.Tamas

    ,

    I see your point.

    However, it is a choice that we made not to have the fit in for the pin name that is the best solution, on my point of view.

    Or else, we would have some pins larger than the other...The pinout view would be a mess.

    For the moment, it is not planned to change the pinout view.

    BR. Jeanne

    View in thread

    4 replies

    Imen.D
    ST Technical Moderator
    May 15, 2017 8:56 AM UTC
    Posted on May 15, 2017 at 10:56

    Hi,

    Could you please attach your .ioc file?  I will highlight this issue internally to our CubeMx team.

    Thanks

    Imen

    In order to give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on 'Best answer' on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question. Thanks
    Tamas Novak
    Tamas NovakAuthor
    Associate III
    May 15, 2017 4:01 PM UTC
    Posted on May 15, 2017 at 16:01

    Here I attach the .ioc.

    It happens also on-screen in CubeMX at low zoom levels. It seems this 'low-zoom view' is stored into pdf. It may depend also on system font and graphics driver.

    ________________

    Attachments :

    H512.ioc.zip : https://st--c.eu10.content.force.com/sfc/dist/version/download/?oid=00Db0000000YtG6&ids=0680X000006HydY&d=%2Fa%2F0X0000000bAf%2FsXNhm3zLZttT6dbNgogPlJibpnfZv4So954k3WmAJcU&asPdf=false
    Tamas Novak
    Tamas NovakAuthor
    Associate III
    May 16, 2017 11:39 AM UTC
    Posted on May 16, 2017 at 11:39

    It's nothing to do with 

    'locating stake': it happens at standard pins as well. The graphical representation of a pin is too small to fit pin names especially long (e.g. 'PC15-OSC32_OUT') names.

    Jeanne Joly
    Jeanne JolyBest answer
    Associate
    Jan 16, 2018 1:15 PM UTC
    Posted on January 16, 2018 at 14:15

    Hello

    Novak.Tamas

    ,

    I see your point.

    However, it is a choice that we made not to have the fit in for the pin name that is the best solution, on my point of view.

    Or else, we would have some pins larger than the other...The pinout view would be a mess.

    For the moment, it is not planned to change the pinout view.

    BR. Jeanne

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement