Why Motor Profiler doesn't support STEVAL-SPIN3202/3201 boards?

[Zt Liu]

Posted on June 25, 2018 at 15:01

Since 

STSPIN32F0/A already contains a F0 core,

and there is st-link on board.

Why motor profiler does not support these two boards?

#spin32f0

[Diandi Zhu]

Posted on July 10, 2018 at 20:32

I saw a post they say F0 just not powerful enough to run the profiler. Only F3 and up

[Zt Liu]

Posted on July 11, 2018 at 17:57

Thanks for reply, Diandi!

That's what I think too,

for if you compile the sample project in STSW-SPIN3201, 

the flash and ram are almost 100% utilized!

[Diandi Zhu]

Posted on July 11, 2018 at 18:09

I encountered the same problem. At beginning I tried to generate a trueStudio project, compiled with &39-o3&39 optimization on. The code size is less than 32k but it didn&39t(I read a post after pointing out that the hal library for F0 is not supported in TrueStudio yet. I don&39t know if that&39s the problem. And I also tried LL driver with no luck) So I switched to keil(you can get free license for f0), now the compiled code size is about 23k with only hall sensor enabled.

I have a post about code size here:

https://community.st.com/0D50X00009XkW99SAF

 

[cedric H]

Dear all,

You are right, F0 is not powerful enough to do profiling. The main reason is that there is no FPU which is mandatory.

Regards

Cedric

[Laurent Ca...]

The question has been moved from the "Motor Control Hardware" section to the "STM32 Motor Control" section (the question is about the STM32 MC SDK). 

Best regards