Skip to main content
FBLBest answer
ST Technical Moderator
Dec 24, 2025 8:41 AM UTC

Hi @Brenden_PLUS 

Differences mainly lie in number of peripheral instances and clock/reset bus architecture, not in core functionality. Also, note that, minor silicon revisions and optimizations may exist between these 2 families.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Best answer" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.Best regards,FBL

2 replies

FBLBest answer
ST Technical Moderator
Dec 24, 2025 8:41 AM UTC

Hi @Brenden_PLUS 

Differences mainly lie in number of peripheral instances and clock/reset bus architecture, not in core functionality. Also, note that, minor silicon revisions and optimizations may exist between these 2 families.

To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Best answer" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.Best regards,FBL
Senior
Dec 26, 2025 8:32 PM UTC

Thanks for the info

 

I decided not to go down the road of linking the address to the device tree to try it.  

 

Currently Zephyr and USB c is kind of the bare minimum.  You can see the github issue list here.

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/38371

 

But it's mostly the bare minimum.  To minimum for my needs.