STM32F4 - SDIO FAT write problem

[Jan Slavot�nek]

Posted on June 21, 2017 at 14:26

Hi community!

To replicate my setup you need:

- discovery (F407)

- Discover - M0 expansion 'shield'

- Sd Card

- download my test project under atollic here (cube mx project included):    

https://uloz.to/!mbYhN53eRdyf/cubemx-sdio-fat-sdkarta-rar

 

In one of my projects i am trying to achieve to save data from mems microphone to .wav on sd card using FAT. It worked, but unfortunately, from time to time, when i try to write new chunk of data into the file, f_write() return me an error (FR_DISK_ERR). 

To find the source of the issue i have made a new project, where i only setup sdio, FAT, push button and a timer that triggers writing of a new chung of dummy data into the sd card (file). (that simulates the stream of data from microphone). The issue occure sometimes on the 3rd write batch (button push), sometimes on 5th, ... It varies. With each new batch i open a new file with incremented number in its name so i can later observe with what number of file did the issie occured.

The procedure goes like this:

Program waits for blue button to be pushed

then program mouts the SD card (f_mount) 

if(f_mount(&SDFatFs, (TCHAR const*)SD_Path, 0) != FR_OK) 

then open a new file

f_open(&MyFile, FilName, FA_CREATE_ALWAYS|FA_WRITE) != FR_OK) new file

then comes the write while loop where i write new chunk of data every 2 ms or so

f_write(&MyFile, u8WriteBuffer, WR_BUFF_SIZE,(void *)&byteswritten);

and after the write of whole batch (2500 chunks of 176 B)  is done, program waits for another button push ...

Can somebody give me some feedback on that? Where could be the problem? Do anyone faced same problem?

Thank you very much

best regards

Jan 

#issue #sdio #stm32f4 #sdcard #fat-fs #sdio-write-data-problem

[Jan Slavot�nek]

Posted on June 22, 2017 at 09:33

When i made chunks to be written smaller in size, it now perform better, but i will need higher writing speed in the future. 

I conclude, that i should probably use DMA for transferring of a data. Please can anyone of you reccomend how to setup the DMA? 

[Tesla DeLorean]

Posted on June 22, 2017 at 15:20

The read/write should ideally be done a large multiples of 512 bytes, and aligned on the same with respect to file offset. Better something the size of a cluster (power of two, 4K, 8K .. 32K).

Doing odd sizes and alignments will result in a lot of unnecessary reading/writing, and block erasing on the card.

The CubeMX/HAL implementation seems to be very fragile, can't help you with that.

Speed is highly variable, the performance/quality of the cards is very important. Cheap ones tend to have very slow writes, despite whatever 'Class' they claim to be.

[Jan Slavot�nek]

Posted on June 23, 2017 at 10:10

Thanks for your reply Clive! 

Your advice on write chunk size noted! I will experiment with sizes like that. 

'The CubeMX/HAL implementation seems to be very fragile' You mean implementation of sdio drivers? 

[Jan Slavot�nek]

Posted on June 27, 2017 at 16:08

Hello everyone!

I am investigating my SDIO FATfs case further more. Here are some observations i have made so far:

1) When i test sending the batches of dummy data (2500 chunks of 64 bytes with 2ms interval, then 1s pause and start over again) using only HAL_Delay for timing the application works reasonably well. I am able to open close hundreds of files writing one batch of dummy data into it. 

I have printed few digital analyser scopes made using ''HAL_Delay'' triggering method so you can observe signals. In my program i set/reset PD14 before/after every f_write() function. I  have noticed, that only every 9th data chunk f_write() will cause SDIO lines to move and also it takes much longer time (looking at SD14 pin toggle told me). previous 8 writes only do only something with cmd line and it takes much less time inside f_write function (PD14 toggle).

2) When i go back to using my timer TIM6 PeriodElapsedCallback() for triggering of sending of 64B chunks soon enough (after few batches <each batch is written into separate file with incremented index name>) the f_write returns FR_DISK_ERR. 

My theory is that somehow timer interrupt interfere with the 9th long writes? Is it that f_write function should not be interrupted? But if i am not mystaken, systick interrupt is also used for HAL_Delay() so what is the difference? 

Tomorrow i will add my observations from ''TIM6 triggering failing'' case.

[misagh]

Posted on June 27, 2017 at 17:16

Hey

Slavot_nek.Jan

,

I had the same problem. Actually it seems that it happens when writing fast to SD card simultaneously. For me, decreasing the SDIO clock speed worked, but I strongly recommend you to change your code to DMA based. It is really faster and you can sure that you never face this problem.

Regards,

Misagh

[Jan Slavot�nek]

Posted on June 28, 2017 at 08:56

Hi

Salmanzadeh.Misagh

Thank you very much for your answer. I was googling for how to guide how to implement DMA method of SDIO FAT instead of polling (i guess i am using polling when I chose in CubeMX only sdio and then fatfs and thats all ... didnt allow interrupt nor didnt set DMA's).

Salmanzadeh.Misagh

an you please give me some kind of guide or refference on some material on how to set up DMA for SDIO +fatfs?

I would be very grateful to you!