Should nor flash be mapped as non cacheable memory ?

[ranran]

Hello,

When using external NOR is it reasonable to configure its memory addresses as cacheable or should it always be configured as NON-cacheable?

If it is cacheable it means that when executing a programming nor command, it is not yet written into device.

Only if PROGRAM_TIMEOUT is large enough then validation works (write, read and compare)

 HAL_NOR_Program(&norHandle, (uint32_t *)(NOR_DEVICE_ADDR + uwStartAddress), pData);
 
 if(HAL_NOR_GetStatus(&norHandle, NOR_DEVICE_ADDR, PROGRAM_TIMEOUT) != HAL_NOR_STATUS_SUCCESS)
 ....

1. Why a large timeout result in validation suceess ? Does it mean that only after this timeout the data was actually writted into device (in cacheable mapping scenario) ?
2. I've configured NOR address in MPU as non cacheable and thing behave better: the timeout can be lowered to 0 , and there is also the certainty that each NOR programming reaches NOR device.

Shouldn't it be always configured as non cahceable also in examples ?

Thank you for any comment,

ranran

[Tesla DeLorean]

The magic write sequences and status reads are incompatible with caching.​

[ranran]

That's interesting.

Probably in examples ST forgot to add NOR into MPU region as non cacheable.

Thanks