Skip to main content
re.wolff9
Senior
August 10, 2016
Solved

New chips with U suffix.

  • August 10, 2016
  • 2 replies
  • 1688 views
Posted on August 10, 2016 at 09:39

I am used to chips being marked for example ''STM32F405VGT6''. However, from several people I hear that now chips marked with an additional ''U'' at the end are showing up. Date code 1613 or something like that. 

One person reported problems with that chip. 

To be honest: I personally don't think it's the chip, but I would like to know what that U stands for (the datasheet clearly states that this U does not exist....)
    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Best answer by Amel NASRI
    Posted on January 31, 2017 at 08:14

    Hi

    Keenan.Wayne

    ‌,

    The referenced discussion is

    https://community.st.com/0D50X00009XkgahSAB

    .

    The presentation providing details about these part numbering is available in

    http://www.st.com/content/ccc/resource/sales_and_marketing/presentation/product_presentation/fe/2b/c4/7b/81/d9/45/bd/stm32java_mkt_pres.pdf/files/stm32java_mkt_pres.pdf/jcr:content/translations/en.stm32java_mkt_pres.pdf

    .

    -Amel

    2 replies

    Wayne Keenan
    Associate
    January 31, 2017
    Posted on January 31, 2017 at 02:33

    That link doesn't work for me.  Googling s a rabbit hole...a Wikipedia article on STM chips indicates that for ST's Java chips a U suffix means 'sample', does  that follow for the non-Java chips ????

    Does anyone know?

    Amel NASRI
    Amel NASRIBest answer
    ST Technical Moderator
    January 31, 2017
    To give better visibility on the answered topics, please click on "Best Answer" on the reply which solved your issue or answered your question.
    waclawek.jan
    Super User
    June 15, 2018
    Posted on June 15, 2018 at 11:13

    Amel,

    the link to the presentation does not work, returns 404.

    And, what's more puzzling, it returns 404 even from the current ST website, when clicking on the searched link:

    0690X0000060LHUQA2.png

    I know that this is an old document which may not be valid anymore, but for continuity reasons, could you please dig it out and archive it here?

    Thanks,

    Jan