Skip to main content
GreenGuy
Senior III
July 5, 2018
Question

cubeMX timebase tick prioirty

  • July 5, 2018
  • 2 replies
  • 520 views
Posted on July 05, 2018 at 20:36

I am comparing the differences between the project/application for the STM32H7 FatFs example in FatFs_uSD_DMA_RTOS and a project created using CubeMX (w/STM32H7 V1.2.0) for the H743i_Eval board.  One of the differences is in the priority given to the tick interrupt.  In the example project it is set to 1 and in the CubeMX generated files it is set to 0.  I do not know if this is a significant reason as to why the project example works and the CubeMX generated version does not.  However, it think it interesting that CubeMX does not allow the setting of the Time Base priority as the NVIC configuration tab has the priority number preset to 0 and the values greyed out.

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    2 replies

    Pavel A.
    July 5, 2018
    Posted on July 05, 2018 at 23:36

    Which timer is used for HAL tick in the project with RTOS? Is it FreeRTOS or RTX?

    -- pa

    GreenGuy
    GreenGuyAuthor
    Senior III
    July 6, 2018
    Posted on July 06, 2018 at 01:38

    timer 6 - FreeRTOS