Skip to main content
John F.
Associate III
January 31, 2018
Question

Is the STM32H7 intended to replace F7 family?

  • January 31, 2018
  • 11 replies
  • 6453 views
Posted on January 31, 2018 at 16:50

Is the STM32H7 intended to replace F7 family? I want to start a design and considered the F7 family but will it disappear when the H7 is in full production?

#stm32h7 #stm32f7
This topic has been closed for replies.

11 replies

Tesla DeLorean
Guru
January 31, 2018
Posted on January 31, 2018 at 17:05

I doubt it, the variety of parts allows for price stratification, and attack different markets.

The 400 MHz speed makes it competitive against the ATMEL/MICROCHIP CM7 parts which have been 300 MHz FPU-D since inception.

Tips, Buy me a coffee, or three.. PayPal Venmo (See Profile) Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
Tesla DeLorean
Guru
January 31, 2018
Posted on January 31, 2018 at 17:07

Also publically committed to the STM32F7 thru January 2027

http://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/support/resources/product-longevity.html

 
Tips, Buy me a coffee, or three.. PayPal Venmo (See Profile) Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
Khouloud GARSI
ST Employee
January 31, 2018
Posted on January 31, 2018 at 17:24

Hello

FitzGerald.John

,

The STM32F7 and STM32H7 are two distinct families. They will coexist on the market.

You can pursue your design based on our STM32F7 device without concerns.

Khouloud.

Asantos
Associate III
February 1, 2018
Posted on February 01, 2018 at 10:44

Hi Khoulound,

We know that the ST will not stop producing STM32F7 that have already been released. The question is: Will all future cortex-m7 releases be in the STM32H7 family? Or will there be new releases in the STM32F7 family as well?

Ari.

Khouloud GARSI
ST Employee
February 1, 2018
Posted on February 01, 2018 at 11:14

Hello

Mendes.Ari

‌,

We are providingdifferent STM32F7 lines offering various features.

Shall I understand that you have a particular use case that can not be realized using the STM32F7 MCUs already existing on the market?

Khouloud.

John F.
John F.Author
Associate III
February 1, 2018
Posted on February 01, 2018 at 09:06

Thanks Clive and Khouloud for the quick replies and helpful information.

T J
Senior III
February 1, 2018
Posted on February 01, 2018 at 12:33

as far as I can see, the H7 will drop in on an existing F7 PCB.

I checked the 208pin LQFP, and every pin looks good. FMC pins, Ethernet MII, USB Device/Host, Spi,IIC,Uarts,DSI all line up, pin for pin.

Frederic LE CAM
ST Employee
February 8, 2018
Posted on February 08, 2018 at 03:31

The STM32F7 family is a large portfolio covered by the 10 years longevity comittment as advertized by ST for the whole STM32 family so there is absolutely  no issue to start a new design with any member of this series. The many STM32 series are based upon different technology nodes depending on the objectives that are targeted for the given series, be it the performance, be it  the low power consumption or any other combination. On the high performance path, the STM32H7 platform will see some other variants proposed in the future to expand the offering.  

Tesla DeLorean
Guru
May 11, 2018
Posted on May 11, 2018 at 13:40

Multi-core, DSI and SWV that works? SDMMC seems a bit marginal at times, much more touchy at 4-bit than F7 implementation, perhaps related to change in IP for DDR/UDR? Documentation that lacks a good technical editor?

Core/process seems viable to 500 MHz, so head room there.

I wish ST would be more forward in their presentation about what is happening about the H7, seems like the abandoned step-child 18 months in here.

Tips, Buy me a coffee, or three.. PayPal Venmo (See Profile) Up vote any posts that you find helpful, it shows what's working..
Asantos
Associate III
May 16, 2018
Posted on May 16, 2018 at 18:07

I read in a chinese presentation something like a dual-core 480MHZ M7 + 240MHZ M4 for next H7. So the H7 should only grow to higher-ends.