NUC vs LAPTOP

[Smithson]

So I am stumped, which is not unusual.  If I run the SENSOR TBP on a Intel NUC it will run for a long time, days.  It I run the TBP on a lap top of common origin, it might run for 40 seconds, or a few hours, but never days.  

Both have Windows 11 and both are good computers. This happens across two NUC’s so it is not a random act of chance.  

Neil: Any thoughts?

I went through the TBP documentation last night as I now have two more and I could not find an orientation sketch.  

 

[Andrew Neil]

It I run the TBP on a laptop of common origin, it might run for 40 seconds, or a few hours

 

So what happens after those 40 seconds, or few hours ?

[Smithson]

Errors
The errors that occur, usually the first mostly, the second occasionally and the group rarely.
I amended the CLI EXAMPLE c++ code to make the errors take up less code space, but these are coming from the closed DLL’s, 
I fail to see why the DLL’s are not given with the code?
They are unpredictable, 

 

[Smithson]

These accelerometers have a number of advantages with the FFT that is taking our analysis into some interesting places, that old accelerometers masked due to thermal loads

But I am over-collecting data, taking about 19.1 seconds, at 2000 Hz, split into two FFT with 16384 each and throw away about 0.5 seconds.  

These things are almost a treasure, but the code is challenging and I do not have the time to fix it as I did with 210 devices. 

The NUC has run for 2.66 days. I am amazed.